AdvocateKhoj
Login : Advocate | Client
Home Post Your Case My Account Law College Law Library
    

Report No. 156

113. Substitution of new section for section 494: Bigamy.-

(a) Do you agree that Explanation 1 be added to section 494 in the Penal Code as a consequence of Supreme Court decision in Bhaurao v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1965 SC 1964. In the following manner:-

"Explanation 1.-For the purposes of this section, a person shall be deemed to marry again whatever legal defect there may be in contracting, celebrating or performing such later marriage"?

(b) Do you agree that Explanation 2 to section 494 be added as a result of Law Commission's recommendations by which it is made clear that where the relevant divorce law prohibits re-marriage of a party within a specified period after a decree of dissolution, such re-marriage amounts to bigamy in the following manner:-

"Where a marriage has been dissolved by a decree of a competent court but the parties are, by virtue of a provision of the enactment under which their marriage is dissolved, prohibited from re-marrying within a specified period, then for the purposes of this section, marriage shall, notwithstanding its dissolution, be deemed to subsist during that period"?

Explanation 3 is proposed to be added to section 494 incorporating the principle laid down by the Supreme Court in Sarla Mudgal's case reported in AIR 1995 SC 1531. Explanation 3 reads as follows:

Explanation 3.-The offence is committed when any person converts himself or herself to another religion for the purpose of marrying again during the subsistence of the earlier marriage.



The Indian Penal Code Back




Client Area | Advocate Area | Blogs | About Us | User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Advertise | Media Coverage | Contact Us | Site Map
powered and driven by neosys