Login : Advocate | Client
Home Post Your Case My Account Law College Law Library

Report No. 58

Object of inquiry

6.5. In including the two alternatives1 in Question No. 7 our main purpose was first to solicit opinion on the questions as the whether the person reference proceedings, which take considerable time and almost always lead to delay in the disposal of references in the High Court, should be continued or should be dropped.

1. Para. 6.1, supra.

Structure and Jurisdiction of the Higher Judiciary Back

Client Area | Advocate Area | Blogs | About Us | User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Advertise | Media Coverage | Contact Us | Site Map
powered and driven by neosys