 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
 |
 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Report No. 33 7. Analysis of offences specified in section 44, Code of Criminal Procedure.- The offences specified in section 44 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, seem to lend themselves to a broad classification as follows: -
From this classification, it would appear that the offences in respect of which information is required to be given, are either those which create a sense of insecurity or show a malignant heart bent upon mischief-offences which, by their very nature, are such that immediate arrest is necessary to restore the sense of security or to prevent the offender from inflicting further harm. This is true even of the offence under section 382, Indian Penal Code which, though not constituting full-fledged robbery, practically amounts to robbery1. Further, the overt acts which constitute most of the offences specified in section 44 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, are so obvious, that ordinarily it would not be difficult for a layman to determine that an "offence" of the specified category has been committed. 1. Section 392, Indian Penal Code.    |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
|
 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Back