Contents |
Chapter I |
Introduction |
|
Introduction (1) |
|
Introduction (2) |
Chapter II |
The Purpose of Administrative Law |
|
The Purpose of Administrative Law |
|
Advantages of Administrative Tribunals |
Chapter III |
Administrative Remedies in Other Countries and in India Part I |
|
Administrative Remedies in Other Countries and in India Part I |
|
Other reforms made by the Act of 1958 |
|
Work of the council on tribunals |
|
Report of the Committee of Justice |
|
Judicial Review in Australia |
|
Federal Republic of Germany |
|
Belgium |
|
Italy |
|
Greece |
|
Turkey |
|
Human Rights under the European Convention-Relevance to Administrative law |
|
Position in United States of America |
|
Attempts of reforms relevant to our study made in the past in India |
|
Second Recommendation |
|
Adjudicatory Machinery under the Customs Act, 1962 |
|
Appeals to collector |
|
Appellate Tribunal |
|
Powers of board or collector of customs to pass certain orders |
|
Statement of case to the High Courts |
|
Appeal to the Supreme Court of India |
|
Central Excise Act, 1944 |
|
Appeals to the Appellate Tribunal |
|
Statement of case to High Court |
|
Appeals to Supreme Court |
|
Adjudication process under the Gold (Control) Act, 1968 |
Chapter IV |
Central Administrative Tribunal |
|
Constitution of the Central Administrative Tribunal |
|
Section 17 empowers the Tribunal to punish for contempt |
|
Observations of the Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India |
|
Administrative Tribunals constituted under the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 |
|
Necessity for training of personnel manning the tribunals |
|
Measures to check deterioration in moral values-Corruption and nepotism are on the increase in the selection process |
|
Constitution of National Appellate Administrative Tribunal: An alternative recommendation |
|
Grouping Appeals before CAT/SAT and the proposed National Appellate Administrative Tribunal |
|
Disposal of cases on the basis of arguments filed by the parties even through the post |
|
Constitution of Benches of retired members of Tribunals |
|
Laying down of the policy and machinery to curb litigation between employees and the Government |
|
Need to quantify the costs for raising frivolous defences |
|
Need to evolve a mechanism for nipping in the bud the conflicting interpretation at the CAT/High Court |
|
Locus standi of aggrieved party to review the order and the need to provide explicitly the extent of the powers of review of CAT and the need to publish it in the newspapers and to circulate it by the concerned department so that persons can intervene in the proceedings by which they will be adversely affected |
Chapter V |
Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (CEGAT) |
|
Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (CEGAT) |
Chapter VI |
Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) |
|
Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) |
|
Certain General Observations |
Chapter VII |
Conclusion |
|
Conclusion (1) |
|
Conclusion (2) |
Annexure |
D.O. No. 6(3)(21)/93-L.C.(LS) |
|
Questionnaire on service Tribunal |
|
Additional Questionnaire on Service Tribunals |
|
Questionnaire on Income-Tax and Cegat Tribunals |
|
Supplementary Questionnaire on Income-Tax and Cegat Tribunal |
Annexure II |
Annexure II |
|
Extracts taken from the Judgment of R.K. Jain v. Union of India,(1993) 4 SCC 120 |
|
Law Commission of India Revised Additional Questionnaire on Administrative Tribunals |
Part I |
Central/State Administrative Tribunal |
Part II |
Central/State Administrative Tribunal |
Section I |
Working of Administrative Tribunals Proposed Changes In Structure and Measures to Be Take for Providing an Efficacious Forum |
Section II |
A Basic Feature of The Constitution |
Section III |
Proposed Changes In Structure and Functioning |
Part III |
The Creation of an Appellate Forum |
Section I |
Appeal to The Special Bench of The High Court |
Section II |
Appeal to The Proposed National Administrative Appellate Tribunal |
Section III |
Creation of An Appellate Forum and The Requirements of Judicial Review |