Login : Advocate | Client
Home Post Your Case My Account Law College Law Library

Report No. 99

4.4. View of Dr. McWhinney.-

We may also note that Dr. McWhinney, in his reply to Question 23, has regarded such disposal (disposal without oral arguments) as practicable where no really consequential or new constitutional points are involved.1

1. Dr. Edward McWhinney's reply dated 18-1-1984, sent to the Member-Secretary, Law Commission of India.

Oral and Written Arguments in the Higher Courts Back

Client Area | Advocate Area | Blogs | About Us | User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Advertise | Media Coverage | Contact Us | Site Map
The information provided on is solely available at your request for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement.
Powered and driven by Neosys Inc