| Contents |
| Chapter I |
Introductory |
| 1.1 |
Scope of the Report |
| 2. |
Observations of Supreme Court |
| 3. |
Scope |
| 4. |
Claims under the Motor Vehicles Act |
| 5. |
Objects of Chapter 8 |
| 6. |
Compulsory insurance |
| 7. |
Forum for adjudication |
| 8. |
Object of amending Bill of 1955 |
| 9. |
Amendment of 1956 |
| 10. |
Amendment of 1969 |
| 11. |
Motor car as the cause of congestion |
| 12. |
Various alternatives adopted |
| 13. |
Devices adopted in various countries to effect reform |
| 14. |
Strict liability and common law |
| 15. |
Question of elimination of fault |
| 16. |
Compensation by the State not discussed |
| 17. |
Reforms relating to Tribunals and procedure |
| 18. |
Past Reports of Law Commission |
| Chapter 2 |
The Present Law, and General Recommendation as to Chapter 8 |
| 2.1 |
Analysis of Chapter 8 |
| 2. |
Substantive provisions |
| 3. |
Grouping of provisions |
| 4. |
Scheme of sections 94-111 |
| 5. |
Tripartite character |
| 6. |
Definitions |
| 7. |
Chapter 8-Recommendation to revise heading |
| Chapter 3 |
Liability without Fault |
| 3.1 |
Peculiar features of accidents by Motor vehicles |
| 2. |
Time taken in proof of negligence |
| 3. |
Traffic accidents |
| 4. |
Scope of the Chapter |
| 5. |
Statutory exceptions to principle of fault |
| 6. |
Burden of proof in special cases |
| 7. |
Present position |
| 8. |
Remedies attempted to minimise litigation |
| 9. |
Difficulties of proof |
| 10. |
Legislative service to avoid disputes as to fault |
| 11. |
Strict liability |
| 12. |
Legislative device to avoid disputes as to quantum |
| 13. |
Common Law |
| 14. |
Liability for motor vehicles |
| 15. |
Scope of reforms based on "No fault" liability |
| 16. |
No fault system |
| 17,18 |
Various systems of compensation for harm |
| 19. |
Liability based on fault |
| 20. |
Qualification to fault theory |
| 21. |
English and American law |
| 22. |
Emphasis on insurance |
| 23. |
Need for reform |
| 24. |
Pronouncements of High Courts |
| 25. |
Flaw in Patna ruling |
| 26. |
Supreme Court decision |
| 27. |
View of Supreme Court |
| 28. |
Suggestions made by later decisions of the Supreme Court |
| 29. |
Judgment of Supreme Court-Difficulties enumerated in another judgment |
| 30,31. |
Recent judgment of the Supreme Court |
| 32. |
Justification |
| 33. |
Two major considerations justifying no fault liability |
| 34. |
Reduction of delay |
| 35. |
Position elsewhere as to no fault |
| 36. |
Speeches in the House of Lords |
| 37. |
Viscount Sankey's speech |
| 38. |
Lord Buckmaster's speech |
| 39. |
Lord Danesfort's speech |
| 40. |
Objection anticipated |
| 41. |
Third reading |
| 42. |
Observations in 51st Report of the Law Commission of India |
| 43. |
Arguments in support of no fault liability |
| 44. |
Arguments against no fault liability |
| 45. |
Introduction of liability without fault recommended |
| 46. |
Position in other countries |
| 47. |
Variety of schemes |
| 48. |
Limitations recommended in cases of no fault liability |
| 49. |
Limitations in other countries |
| 50. |
Position in Nordic countries |
| 51. |
Position in U.S.A |
| 52. |
Maximum amount table to be annexed |
| 53. |
Provision in Railway Act |
| 54. |
Limits-Narrow views |
| 55. |
Contributory negligence |
| 56. |
View of most High Courts |
| 57. |
Position in England |
| 58. |
Modification of contributory negligence rule in some countries on continent |
| 59. |
Difficulties of proof even in a system of comparative negligence |
| 60. |
Recommendation-Contributory negligence to be disregarded |
| 61. |
Cases of suicide excluded |
| 62. |
Main features of proposed scheme and their rationale |
| 63. |
New Chapter to be inserted |
| Chapter 3A |
Liability without Fault |
|
Liability without Fault |
| 64. |
Other alternatives considered for higher recovery on the basis of fault |
| 65. |
Cases before the Tribunal to be decided on no fault basis |
| 66. |
Claims before ordinary courts to be governed by fault |
| Chapter 4 |
Beneficiaries of Compulsory Insurance |
| 4.1 |
Scope of the Chapter |
| 2. |
Section 95(1), proviso |
| 3. |
Persons excluded by virtue of section 91(1), proviso |
| 4. |
Anomaly caused by present position as to owner of goods |
| 5. |
Need for change |
| 6. |
Social justice and judicial observations suggesting reform |
| 7. |
Present position not justified |
| 8. |
Recommendation as to section 95(1), proviso |
| Chapter 5 |
Limits on Liability of The Insurer |
| 5.1 |
Scope |
| 2. |
Need to delete the limits |
| 3. |
Removal of limit under section 95(2) suggested by Supreme Court |
| 4. |
Removal of limit suggested by High Courts |
| 5. |
English Act |
| 6. |
Section 95(2)-Recommendation to delete limit |
| 7. |
Section 95(2)-Alternative recommendation to insert uniform lin of Rs. Two lakhs |
| 8. |
Revised section 95(2) |
| Chapter 6 |
Duty to Furnish Particulars of Insurance and Accident |
| 6.1 |
Supply of particulars by registering authority for police to Tribunal for injured person |
| 2. |
Section 109-Supply of copies of information |
| 3. |
Duty to give information |
| 4. |
Recommendation to insert new sections imposing obligation on the police and the Hospital authorities to communicate certain information as to accidents |
| 5. |
Position in Tamil Nadu |
| 6. |
Rule in Tamil Nadu |
| 7. |
Recommendation to insert sections 109A and 109B |
| Chapter 7 |
The Claims Tribunal |
| 7.1 |
Scope |
| 2. |
Appointment of members of the Tribunals |
| 3. |
Section 110(1), proviso-Claims for damage to property |
| 4. |
Difficulties created by section 110(1), proviso |
| 5. |
Practical impact of proviso |
| 6. |
Need for section 110, proviso, debatable-Deletion recommended |
| 7,8,9. |
Recommendation |
| 10. |
Section 110(4) |
| 11. |
Power to transfer suit appeals and other proceedings |
| 12. |
Recommendation to insert section 110(5) |
| Chapter 8 |
Application for Compensation |
| 8.1 |
Section 110A(1) |
| 2. |
Section 110A(2) |
| 3. |
Section 110A(3)-Limitation |
| 4. |
No change |
| 5. |
Another question to be considered later |
| Chapter 9 |
Effect of Death, and The Meaning of "Legal Representative" |
| 9.1 |
Effect of death-Death of the wrong-doer |
| 2. |
Survival of the issue of action-Death of tort feasor |
| 3. |
Death of the claimant during pendency of the claim |
| 4. |
Section 110A(1)(b)-"Legal representative" |
| 5. |
Meaning of "Legal representative" |
| 6. |
Position under Fatal Accidents Act |
| 7. |
Nature of right conferred by Fatal Accidents Act |
| 8. |
Controversy as to meaning of "Legal representative" in Motor Vehicles Act |
| 9,10. |
Question for consideration |
| 11. |
Second view |
| 12. |
Third view |
| 13,14. |
Recommendation to define "legal representative" |
| 15. |
Recommendation to insert section 2(11) |
| Chapter 10 |
Option Regarding Claims for Compensation |
| 10.1,2. |
Section 110AA |
| Chapter 11 |
Parties |
| 11.1,2. |
Scope |
| 3. |
Controversy as to persons entitled to claim compensation |
| 4. |
Delhi view |
| 5. |
Kerala view |
| 6. |
No change in section 110B |
| 7. |
Section 110B to be amended to cover all persons liable |
| 8. |
Position examined |
| 9. |
Recommendation to amend section 110B |
| 10. |
Amendment of section 110B to save limits as to quantum of compensation recommended |
| Chapter 12 |
Appearance of Parties |
| 12.1 |
Appearance through legal practitioner |
| 2. |
Madhya Pradesh rule |
| 3. |
Section 110BB to be inserted |
| Chapter 13 |
Evidence and Procedure |
| 13.1 |
Mode of recording evidence |
| 2. |
Procedure in the Act |
| 3. |
Provisions to be made in rules |
| Chapter 14 |
Interest Section 110CC |
| 14.1 |
Section 110CC |
| 2. |
Two periods to be dealt with |
| 3. |
Interest prior to making of claim |
| 4. |
Position under Interest Act, 1978 |
| 5. |
Later Acts |
| 6. |
Need for parity as regards period before claims |
| 7. |
Period after the making of the claim-need for parity |
| 8. |
Section 110CC-Recommendation as to rate of interest and making interest mandatory |
| 9. |
Recommendation to revise section 110CC |
| Chapter 15 |
Appeal and Execution |
| 15.1 |
Section 110D(1)-Appeal |
| 2. |
Recommendation to amend section 110D(1) |
| 3. |
Section 110D(2)-Appeal in petty cases |
| 4. |
Section 110E-Recommendation for deposit of amount of award |
| 5. |
Deposit in High Court |
| 6. |
New section 110EE recommended |
| Chapter 16 |
Jurisdiction and Limitation |
| 16.1 |
Scope of the Chapter |
| 2. |
Limit of jurisdiction-Territorial |
| 3. |
Pecuniary limits |
| 4. |
Section 110E-Discrepancy with section 110(1), proviso (Damage to property |
| 5. |
Section 110E-Causes of action arising before constitution of Tribunal |
| 6. |
Supreme Court judgment |
| 7. |
Difficulty as to limitation |
| 8. |
Need to amend section 110F |
| 9. |
Section 110A(3)-Recommendation for amendment |
| 10. |
Recommendation to amend section 110A(3) |
| Chapter 17 |
Rules |
| 17.1 |
Present position |
| Chapter 18 |
Summary of Recommendations |
|
Chapter 3-Liability without fault |
|
Chapter 4-Beneficiaries of compulsory insurance: section 95(1) |
|
Chapter 6-Duty to furnish particulars of insurance and accident |
|
Chapter 7-The Claims Tribunal: section 110 |
|
Chapter 8-Application for compensation: section 110A |
|
Chapter 11-Parties: section 110B |
|
Chapter 14-Interest: section 110CC |
|
Chapter 16-Jurisdiction and limitation: sections 110F and 110A(3) |
| Appendix 1 |
Extract from The Indian Railways Act, 1890 |
| Appendix 2 |
Extract from The Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 |
| Appendix 3 |
Extract from The Carriage by Air Act, 1972 |
|
Liability of The Carrier |
| Appendix 4 |
Position in Selected Countries as to Compensation for Automobile Accidents |
|
Introductory |
|
Austria |
|
Canada-Saskatchewan |
|
Saskatchewan Legislation |
|
Canada-Other Provinces |
|
Denmark |
|
England-Statutory provision |
|
England-extra statutory machinery |
|
Motor Insurer Bureau in England |
|
Finland |
|
France |
|
Forum in France |
|
West German |
|
Position as to collisions |
|
Road Traffic Act-The Civil Aspect |
|
Contributory negligence |
|
Road Traffic accidents in Germany-Some matters of detail |
|
Japan |
|
Legislation in Japan |
|
Liability in Japan |
|
Use of concepts |
|
Compulsory liability insurance in Japan |
|
Government compensation in Japan |
|
New Zealand |
|
Compensation-Scope of-in New Zealand |
|
Injuries covered in New Zealand |
|
Statutory Commissio |
|
Procedure-Formal application |
|
Earners' scheme in New Zealand |
|
Funds created in New Zealand |
|
Norway |
|
Accident insurance in Norway |
|
Sweden-general position |
|
Swedish law of torts |
|
Swedish Act of 1916 as to motor vehicles |
|
Swedish Act of 1975 as to traffic damage |
|
Personal injury Boards in Sweden |
|
Procedure of Boards |
|
Switzerland |
|
U.S.A |
|
Schemes in U.S.A |
|
Limitations-Illinois plan |
|
Unique aspect of Michigan law-Proprietary loss |
|
Tribunals in New York |
|
Uniform Motor Vehicle Accident Reparation Act |
|
Benefits under the uniform Act in U.S.A |
|
Payment of benefits under the Uniform Act |