Contents |
Chapter I |
Introductory |
1.1 |
Scope of the Report |
2. |
Observations of Supreme Court |
3. |
Scope |
4. |
Claims under the Motor Vehicles Act |
5. |
Objects of Chapter 8 |
6. |
Compulsory insurance |
7. |
Forum for adjudication |
8. |
Object of amending Bill of 1955 |
9. |
Amendment of 1956 |
10. |
Amendment of 1969 |
11. |
Motor car as the cause of congestion |
12. |
Various alternatives adopted |
13. |
Devices adopted in various countries to effect reform |
14. |
Strict liability and common law |
15. |
Question of elimination of fault |
16. |
Compensation by the State not discussed |
17. |
Reforms relating to Tribunals and procedure |
18. |
Past Reports of Law Commission |
Chapter 2 |
The Present Law, and General Recommendation as to Chapter 8 |
2.1 |
Analysis of Chapter 8 |
2. |
Substantive provisions |
3. |
Grouping of provisions |
4. |
Scheme of sections 94-111 |
5. |
Tripartite character |
6. |
Definitions |
7. |
Chapter 8-Recommendation to revise heading |
Chapter 3 |
Liability without Fault |
3.1 |
Peculiar features of accidents by Motor vehicles |
2. |
Time taken in proof of negligence |
3. |
Traffic accidents |
4. |
Scope of the Chapter |
5. |
Statutory exceptions to principle of fault |
6. |
Burden of proof in special cases |
7. |
Present position |
8. |
Remedies attempted to minimise litigation |
9. |
Difficulties of proof |
10. |
Legislative service to avoid disputes as to fault |
11. |
Strict liability |
12. |
Legislative device to avoid disputes as to quantum |
13. |
Common Law |
14. |
Liability for motor vehicles |
15. |
Scope of reforms based on "No fault" liability |
16. |
No fault system |
17,18 |
Various systems of compensation for harm |
19. |
Liability based on fault |
20. |
Qualification to fault theory |
21. |
English and American law |
22. |
Emphasis on insurance |
23. |
Need for reform |
24. |
Pronouncements of High Courts |
25. |
Flaw in Patna ruling |
26. |
Supreme Court decision |
27. |
View of Supreme Court |
28. |
Suggestions made by later decisions of the Supreme Court |
29. |
Judgment of Supreme Court-Difficulties enumerated in another judgment |
30,31. |
Recent judgment of the Supreme Court |
32. |
Justification |
33. |
Two major considerations justifying no fault liability |
34. |
Reduction of delay |
35. |
Position elsewhere as to no fault |
36. |
Speeches in the House of Lords |
37. |
Viscount Sankey's speech |
38. |
Lord Buckmaster's speech |
39. |
Lord Danesfort's speech |
40. |
Objection anticipated |
41. |
Third reading |
42. |
Observations in 51st Report of the Law Commission of India |
43. |
Arguments in support of no fault liability |
44. |
Arguments against no fault liability |
45. |
Introduction of liability without fault recommended |
46. |
Position in other countries |
47. |
Variety of schemes |
48. |
Limitations recommended in cases of no fault liability |
49. |
Limitations in other countries |
50. |
Position in Nordic countries |
51. |
Position in U.S.A |
52. |
Maximum amount table to be annexed |
53. |
Provision in Railway Act |
54. |
Limits-Narrow views |
55. |
Contributory negligence |
56. |
View of most High Courts |
57. |
Position in England |
58. |
Modification of contributory negligence rule in some countries on continent |
59. |
Difficulties of proof even in a system of comparative negligence |
60. |
Recommendation-Contributory negligence to be disregarded |
61. |
Cases of suicide excluded |
62. |
Main features of proposed scheme and their rationale |
63. |
New Chapter to be inserted |
Chapter 3A |
Liability without Fault |
|
Liability without Fault |
64. |
Other alternatives considered for higher recovery on the basis of fault |
65. |
Cases before the Tribunal to be decided on no fault basis |
66. |
Claims before ordinary courts to be governed by fault |
Chapter 4 |
Beneficiaries of Compulsory Insurance |
4.1 |
Scope of the Chapter |
2. |
Section 95(1), proviso |
3. |
Persons excluded by virtue of section 91(1), proviso |
4. |
Anomaly caused by present position as to owner of goods |
5. |
Need for change |
6. |
Social justice and judicial observations suggesting reform |
7. |
Present position not justified |
8. |
Recommendation as to section 95(1), proviso |
Chapter 5 |
Limits on Liability of The Insurer |
5.1 |
Scope |
2. |
Need to delete the limits |
3. |
Removal of limit under section 95(2) suggested by Supreme Court |
4. |
Removal of limit suggested by High Courts |
5. |
English Act |
6. |
Section 95(2)-Recommendation to delete limit |
7. |
Section 95(2)-Alternative recommendation to insert uniform lin of Rs. Two lakhs |
8. |
Revised section 95(2) |
Chapter 6 |
Duty to Furnish Particulars of Insurance and Accident |
6.1 |
Supply of particulars by registering authority for police to Tribunal for injured person |
2. |
Section 109-Supply of copies of information |
3. |
Duty to give information |
4. |
Recommendation to insert new sections imposing obligation on the police and the Hospital authorities to communicate certain information as to accidents |
5. |
Position in Tamil Nadu |
6. |
Rule in Tamil Nadu |
7. |
Recommendation to insert sections 109A and 109B |
Chapter 7 |
The Claims Tribunal |
7.1 |
Scope |
2. |
Appointment of members of the Tribunals |
3. |
Section 110(1), proviso-Claims for damage to property |
4. |
Difficulties created by section 110(1), proviso |
5. |
Practical impact of proviso |
6. |
Need for section 110, proviso, debatable-Deletion recommended |
7,8,9. |
Recommendation |
10. |
Section 110(4) |
11. |
Power to transfer suit appeals and other proceedings |
12. |
Recommendation to insert section 110(5) |
Chapter 8 |
Application for Compensation |
8.1 |
Section 110A(1) |
2. |
Section 110A(2) |
3. |
Section 110A(3)-Limitation |
4. |
No change |
5. |
Another question to be considered later |
Chapter 9 |
Effect of Death, and The Meaning of "Legal Representative" |
9.1 |
Effect of death-Death of the wrong-doer |
2. |
Survival of the issue of action-Death of tort feasor |
3. |
Death of the claimant during pendency of the claim |
4. |
Section 110A(1)(b)-"Legal representative" |
5. |
Meaning of "Legal representative" |
6. |
Position under Fatal Accidents Act |
7. |
Nature of right conferred by Fatal Accidents Act |
8. |
Controversy as to meaning of "Legal representative" in Motor Vehicles Act |
9,10. |
Question for consideration |
11. |
Second view |
12. |
Third view |
13,14. |
Recommendation to define "legal representative" |
15. |
Recommendation to insert section 2(11) |
Chapter 10 |
Option Regarding Claims for Compensation |
10.1,2. |
Section 110AA |
Chapter 11 |
Parties |
11.1,2. |
Scope |
3. |
Controversy as to persons entitled to claim compensation |
4. |
Delhi view |
5. |
Kerala view |
6. |
No change in section 110B |
7. |
Section 110B to be amended to cover all persons liable |
8. |
Position examined |
9. |
Recommendation to amend section 110B |
10. |
Amendment of section 110B to save limits as to quantum of compensation recommended |
Chapter 12 |
Appearance of Parties |
12.1 |
Appearance through legal practitioner |
2. |
Madhya Pradesh rule |
3. |
Section 110BB to be inserted |
Chapter 13 |
Evidence and Procedure |
13.1 |
Mode of recording evidence |
2. |
Procedure in the Act |
3. |
Provisions to be made in rules |
Chapter 14 |
Interest Section 110CC |
14.1 |
Section 110CC |
2. |
Two periods to be dealt with |
3. |
Interest prior to making of claim |
4. |
Position under Interest Act, 1978 |
5. |
Later Acts |
6. |
Need for parity as regards period before claims |
7. |
Period after the making of the claim-need for parity |
8. |
Section 110CC-Recommendation as to rate of interest and making interest mandatory |
9. |
Recommendation to revise section 110CC |
Chapter 15 |
Appeal and Execution |
15.1 |
Section 110D(1)-Appeal |
2. |
Recommendation to amend section 110D(1) |
3. |
Section 110D(2)-Appeal in petty cases |
4. |
Section 110E-Recommendation for deposit of amount of award |
5. |
Deposit in High Court |
6. |
New section 110EE recommended |
Chapter 16 |
Jurisdiction and Limitation |
16.1 |
Scope of the Chapter |
2. |
Limit of jurisdiction-Territorial |
3. |
Pecuniary limits |
4. |
Section 110E-Discrepancy with section 110(1), proviso (Damage to property |
5. |
Section 110E-Causes of action arising before constitution of Tribunal |
6. |
Supreme Court judgment |
7. |
Difficulty as to limitation |
8. |
Need to amend section 110F |
9. |
Section 110A(3)-Recommendation for amendment |
10. |
Recommendation to amend section 110A(3) |
Chapter 17 |
Rules |
17.1 |
Present position |
Chapter 18 |
Summary of Recommendations |
|
Chapter 3-Liability without fault |
|
Chapter 4-Beneficiaries of compulsory insurance: section 95(1) |
|
Chapter 6-Duty to furnish particulars of insurance and accident |
|
Chapter 7-The Claims Tribunal: section 110 |
|
Chapter 8-Application for compensation: section 110A |
|
Chapter 11-Parties: section 110B |
|
Chapter 14-Interest: section 110CC |
|
Chapter 16-Jurisdiction and limitation: sections 110F and 110A(3) |
Appendix 1 |
Extract from The Indian Railways Act, 1890 |
Appendix 2 |
Extract from The Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 |
Appendix 3 |
Extract from The Carriage by Air Act, 1972 |
|
Liability of The Carrier |
Appendix 4 |
Position in Selected Countries as to Compensation for Automobile Accidents |
|
Introductory |
|
Austria |
|
Canada-Saskatchewan |
|
Saskatchewan Legislation |
|
Canada-Other Provinces |
|
Denmark |
|
England-Statutory provision |
|
England-extra statutory machinery |
|
Motor Insurer Bureau in England |
|
Finland |
|
France |
|
Forum in France |
|
West German |
|
Position as to collisions |
|
Road Traffic Act-The Civil Aspect |
|
Contributory negligence |
|
Road Traffic accidents in Germany-Some matters of detail |
|
Japan |
|
Legislation in Japan |
|
Liability in Japan |
|
Use of concepts |
|
Compulsory liability insurance in Japan |
|
Government compensation in Japan |
|
New Zealand |
|
Compensation-Scope of-in New Zealand |
|
Injuries covered in New Zealand |
|
Statutory Commissio |
|
Procedure-Formal application |
|
Earners' scheme in New Zealand |
|
Funds created in New Zealand |
|
Norway |
|
Accident insurance in Norway |
|
Sweden-general position |
|
Swedish law of torts |
|
Swedish Act of 1916 as to motor vehicles |
|
Swedish Act of 1975 as to traffic damage |
|
Personal injury Boards in Sweden |
|
Procedure of Boards |
|
Switzerland |
|
U.S.A |
|
Schemes in U.S.A |
|
Limitations-Illinois plan |
|
Unique aspect of Michigan law-Proprietary loss |
|
Tribunals in New York |
|
Uniform Motor Vehicle Accident Reparation Act |
|
Benefits under the uniform Act in U.S.A |
|
Payment of benefits under the Uniform Act |