Login : Advocate | Client
Home Post Your Case My Account Law College Law Library

Report No. 49

30. Second question does not arise.-

In view of our answer to the first question1, the second question does not arise. Before we part with this Report, it is our pleasant duty to place on record our warm appreciation of the assistance we have received from Mr. Bakshi, Secretary of the Commission, in dealing with the problem covered by the Report. As usual, Mr. Bakshi first prepared a draft which was treated as the Working Paper. The draft was considered by the Commission point by point and its conclusions recorded and, in the light of the decisions, Mr. Bakshi prepared a final draft for consideration and approval. At all stages of the study of this problem, Mr. Bakshi took an active part in our deliberations and has rendered very valuable assistance to the Commission.

1. Para. 29, supra.

P.B. Gajendragadkar, Chairman.

V.R. Krishna Iyer, Members.

P.K. Tripathi, Members.

S.S. Dhavan, Members.

P.M. Bakshi, Secretary.

New Delhi,

Dated: 28th August, 1972.

The Proposal for inclusion of Agricultural Income in the Total Income for the purpose of determining the Rat of Tax under the Income-Tax Act, 1961 Back

Client Area | Advocate Area | Blogs | About Us | User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Advertise | Media Coverage | Contact Us | Site Map
powered and driven by neosys