Login : Advocate | Client
Home Post Your Case My Account Law College Law Library

Report No. 88

10.25. Canada.-

In Canada, the rule (apart from a specific statute, to be presently mentioned)1 as laid down by the case law2 seems to be a liberal one. Most Canadian courts have followed the English decision in Conway v. Rimmer in regard to the subject of State interest, although occasionally a different approach is visible. From a survey of the judicial decisions in Canada, it would appear that at least in cases where there is no question of national security or international relations or cabinet confidence, the claim of privilege on the basis of State interest will be reviewable by the courts in Canad3-4.

1. Para. 10.26, infra.

2. See cases cited in Stanley Schiff Evidence in the Litigation Process, 1978, Vol. 2, p. 1069.

3. Barsbnell Crown Privilege, (1973) 51 Canadian Bar Rev 551.

4. Note Executive Privilege, (1975) 33 Univ. of Toronto Faculty Law Review 181.

Governmental Privilege in Evidence - Sections 123, 124 and 162 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 and Articles 74 and 163 of the Constitution Back

Client Area | Advocate Area | Blogs | About Us | User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Advertise | Media Coverage | Contact Us | Site Map
powered and driven by neosys