AdvocateKhoj
Login : Advocate | Client
Home Post Your Case My Account Law College Law Library
    

Report No. 60

15.11. Case law as to what proof needed.-

Controversies also arise as to whether proof of this or that fact is sufficient to rebut the presumption under section 27. Some of the cases relating to the rebuttal of the presumption are noted in the footnote.1 It may not, how-ever, be convenient to lay down any detailed rules in this regard.

1. (a) Sarkar Estates Pvt. Ltd. v. V.K. Iron Works Ltd., AIR 1961 Cal 439 (442), paras. 3-4 (Refusal to accept);

(b) Sukumar v. Naresh Chandra, AIR 1968 Cal 49;

(c) 1970 All LI 455.







Client Area | Advocate Area | Blogs | About Us | User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Advertise | Media Coverage | Contact Us | Site Map
Powered by Neosys Inc
Information provided on advocatekhoj.com is solely available at your request for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement