
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Report No. 60 1.13. History.- A few other points of a general nature may now be dealt with. It may be convenient to begin with the history of the Act. It would appear that the idea of having a device for shortening statutes could be traced to Bentham and to those who took up the criticism of the legal system made by Bentham.1 1. Carr The Mechanics of Law-making, (1951) Current Legal Problems, p. 122. |
||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |