AdvocateKhoj
Login : Advocate | Client
Home Post Your Case My Account Law College Law Library
    

Report No. 94

9.2. High Courts.-

Three High Courts have sent replies in response to the Working Paper

(i) The Judges of the one High Court have no views to offer in the matter.1

(ii) Another High Court2 regards the present law as just and fair and not needing reform.

(iii) As regards the third High Court, nine of its judges have no views to offer. The rest have not expressed their reaction.3

1. Law Commission File No. F.2(7)/83-L.C., S. No. 4.

2. Law Commission File No. F.2(7)/83-L.C., S. No. 8.

3. Law Commission File No. F.2(7)/83-L.C., S. No. 10.



Evidence Obtained Illegally or Improperly - Proposed Section 166a of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 Back




Client Area | Advocate Area | Blogs | About Us | User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Advertise | Media Coverage | Contact Us | Site Map
powered and driven by neosys