Report No. 152
5.14. Judicial officers.-
It would be proper to mention at this stage the Supreme Court's another judgment in which certain guidelines have been suggested to be followed by police officers or judicial officers.1 The guidelines are as under:-
(a) If a judicial officer is to be arrested for some offence, it should be done under intimation to the District Judge or the High Court as the case may be.
(b) If facts and circumstances necessitate the immediate arrest of a judicial officer of the subordinate judiciary, a technical or formal arrest may be effected.
(c) The fact of such arrest should be immediately communicated to the District and Sessions Judge of the concerned District and the Chief Justice of the High Court.
(d) The judicial officer so arrested shall not be taken to a police station, without the prior order or directions of the District and Sessions Judge of the concerned district, if available.
(g) There should be no handcuffing of a judicial officer. If, however, violent resistance to arrest is offered or there is imminent need to effect physical arrest in order to avert danger to life and limb, the person resisting arrest may be overpowered and handcuffed. In such case, immediate report shall be made to the District and Sessions Judge concerned and also to the Chief Justice of the High Court.
But the burden would be on the police to establish the necessity for effecting physical arrest and handcuffing the judicial officer, and if it be established that the physical arrest and handcuffing of the judicial officer was unjustified, the police officers causing or responsible for such arrest and handcuffing would be guilty of misconduct and would also be personally liable for compensation and/or damages as may be summarily determined by the High Court.
1. Delhi Judicial Service Association v. State of Gujarat, (1991) 4 SCC 406.