Contents |
Chapter I |
Introduction |
1.1 |
The Objective |
2. |
Experience of American Courts |
3. |
Evolving a new model |
Chapter II |
Magnitude of the Problem of Delays in Criminal Cases |
2.1,2. |
Delay in the disposal of criminal trials and appeals |
3 to 6. |
Supreme Court takes cognizance of the matter |
7 to 11. |
Unavailability of relevant statistical data regarding under-trial prisoners |
Chapter III |
Concept of Plea-Bargaining-A Practice being Successfully Practised in U.S.A |
3.1 |
The Concept |
2. |
Not practised in India |
3. |
Origin |
4. |
Reasoning of proponents |
5 to 7. |
Opponents' view points |
8. |
Need to assess the system as it is |
9. |
Assumption that ordinarily the innocent would not plead guilty |
10. |
Do the really guilty escape lightly |
11. |
U.S. Supreme Court upholds constitutionality and recognises the value of plea-bargaining |
12. |
The Supreme Court held that guilty pleas are valid if they are voluntary and intelligent |
13 to 16. |
The Supreme Court also found that the award of lesser punishment pursuant to please bargain is not invalid |
17. |
An Analysis of U.S. Supreme Court Judgments |
18. |
Conclusion |
Chapter IV |
Commission makes a Survey |
|
Commission makes a Survey (1) |
|
Commission makes a Survey (2) |
Chapter V |
Canadian Law Commission examines the Concept in a Working Paper of 1989 and Recommends introduction thereof in Criminal Jurisprudence |
|
Canadian Law Commission examines the Concept in a Working Paper of 1989 and Recommends introduction thereof in Criminal Jurisprudence |
Chapter VI |
Observations of Supreme Court of India Concerning "Plea-Bargaining" in the Context of the Present Legal Frame |
|
Observations of Supreme Court of India Concerning Plea-Bargaining in the Context of the Present Legal Frame |
|
Illegality and Public Policy |
|
Constitutionality |
Chapter VII |
Objections to the Introduction of the Concept in Indian Legal System Answered |
|
Country's social conditions do not justify the introduction of the concept |
|
Pressures from prosecuting agencies may result in convictions of the innocents |
|
The poor will be the ultimate victims of the concept |
|
Counsel representing the accused would be unwilling to advise confession invoking scheme |
|
Plea-bargaining may increase the incidence of crime |
|
Criminals may slip through the net with impunity |
|
No social benefits accrue |
|
Public debate |
|
Conclusion |
Chapter VIII |
Objections to the Application of the Concept in Indian Legal System Answered |
|
Non-application of the Scheme to certain offences |
Chapter IX |
Guidelines and Procedure to be incorporated in the Statute |
|
Competent Authority |
|
Commentary |
|
How to set in motion the machinery |
|
Commentary |
|
Procedure to be followed on institution of an application |
|
Apprising the accused of the implications of the proceedings |
|
If the application is not rejected |
|
Rejection of application |
|
Summoning of record if application is not rejected |
|
Commentary |
|
The hearing of the application |
|
Commentary |
|
Procedure to be followed in cases to which the probation of Offenders Act |
|
Commentary |
|
Procedure to be followed in cases arising out of offences alleged to have been committed which are compoundable under section 320 of Cr. P.C |
|
Procedure to be followed in cases where minimum sentence is provided for the offence alleged to have been committed by an offender |
|
Commentary |
|
Power to convert the section under which charge is levelled to a section constituting a lesser offence |
|
Commentary |
|
Guidelines for determining the quantum of substantive punishment of imprisonment in jail in cases |
|
Guidelines as regards punishment to be imposed |
|
Certain categories to be excluded from the scheme totally or in the first phase |
|
Commentary |
|
Need for amendment of section 357 of Cr. P.C |
|
Definition of 'aggrieved' |
Chapter X |
How the Proposed Scheme overcomes the Objections and Apprehensions entertained by those who doubt the Feasibility of the Concept |
|
How the Proposed Scheme overcomes the Objections and Apprehensions entertained by those who doubt the Feasibility of the Concept |
Chapter XI |
Conclusions |
|
Recommendations |
|
Highlights of the Scheme |
Annexure A |
Feasibility of introducing the Concept of Plea-Bargaining |
|
Performa of Statistical information to be Furnished by the Metropolitan Sessions Judge and District and Sessions Judges |
|
Statement of Criminal Cases (Trials) Disposed of During the Calendar Years 1988 and 1992 |
Annexure B |
Recommendation made by the Law Reform Commission of Canada in Working Paper 60 |
Annexure C |
Verbatim extracts of the Relevant Passages from the Two Leading Cases of U.S. Supreme Court |