
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Report No. 237 Annexure 1- A The analysis of 338 replies to the Questionnaire on section 498A IPC regarding compoundability is as under:
Note: 1. Individuals/organizations/officials talking of repeal and at the same time non-compoundability are 86 in number, implying thereby that instead of making it compoundable, it should be repealed altogether. Otherwise, the two ideas are not in harmony with each other. 2. Regarding compoundability, individuals/organizations/officials who have not given any comments on this aspect are 33(4 women) in number 3. Only Repeal-1 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |