
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Report No. 154 (8) Shri R.G. Sharma, Addl. Director, Prosecution (1) Many times the charge-sheet is filed in court prosecution with delay resulting in acquittal of an accused person. Therefore, there must be provision for punishing the defaulting officers in a case, where charge-sheet is filed with delay. (2) Summary procedure must be adopted in cases of embezzlement. (3) There must be very clear directions for the issuance of production warrants. |
||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |