| Contents |
|
Certain Problems Connected with Powers of The States to Levy a Tax on The Sale of Goods and with The Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 |
|
Genesis, and points referred to the Commission |
|
Scope of the Report |
|
Constitutional position |
|
Limitations on States' powers |
|
Intro-5 |
|
The object of constitutional restrictions |
|
The matters under reference |
|
Points enumerated |
|
Policy matters outside the inquiry |
|
Analysis of the Central Sales Tax Act |
| Chapter 1 |
The Scope for The Levy of Sales Tax by State Governments |
| 1.1 |
Introductory |
| 2. |
Absence of element of passing of property or consensual element |
| 3. |
Definition of Sale in the Sale of Goods Act |
| 4. |
Power of States to levy tax on sale-meaning attributed to sale |
| 5. |
Narrow concept of sale |
| 6. |
No property passed in hire-purchase and building contracts |
| 7. |
Certain transactions not to be regarded as sale |
| 8. |
Definition of 'sale' in the Central Sales Tax Act |
| 9. |
Should the scope of "sale be widened"? |
| Chapter IA |
Taxability of works Contracts |
|
Introductory |
|
Building Contracts |
|
Difference between "Works and Sale" |
|
Position in Some other Countries |
|
Passing of Property |
|
Tests Adopted |
|
Whether Amendment Needed |
| Chapter 1B |
Hire-Purchase Transactions |
|
Introductory |
|
Nature of Hire-Purchase |
|
Taxability of Hire-Purchase Transactions - Position In States |
|
Position under The Central Sales Tax Act |
|
Position in Union Territories-delhi |
|
Need for Amendment |
|
Financial |
|
Constitutional Dichotomy |
|
Hire-purchase not resulting in sale |
| Chapter 1C |
Sale of Controlled Commodities |
|
Sale of controlled commodities |
|
Case law as showing a fluid position |
|
Difficulty of applying the test |
|
Effect of judicial decisions |
|
Case relating to sugarcane-a recent illustration |
|
Recommendation to cover sales of controlled commodities |
|
One alternative-Explanation to be added to State List, entry 54 |
|
Another alternative-amendment of State List, entry 54 |
| Chapter 1D |
Sale by Associations to Members |
|
Sale by associations to members |
|
Co-operative societies |
|
Unincorporated associations |
|
Supply by club to members not 'sale' |
|
No 'sale' in such circumstances in England |
|
General observations |
|
Amendment of Constitution not needed |
| Chapter 1E |
Some General Observations as to Taxation on Sale |
|
General observations as to "sale" |
|
The basic draw back of the present scheme |
| Chapter 2 |
Evasion of Central Sales Tax by Means of Transfer of Goods from one State to another, on what Purports to be Consignment Transfer or a Transfer to another branch of The Same Institution |
| 2.1 |
Ingredients of Sale |
| 2. |
Consignment transfers |
| 3,4. |
Fifth Finance Commission's recommendations |
| 5. |
Section 6A |
| 6. |
Criticism of section 6A |
| 7. |
Bona fide consignments and sham consignments |
| 8 to 11. |
Telco case decided by the Supreme Court |
| 12. |
Question of amendment considered |
| 13. |
Taxation on consignment not within present Act |
| 14. |
Constitutional difficulty in widening the scope of sale-Consignment transactions |
| 15. |
Tax why justifiable |
| 16. |
The Problem of large-scale tax evasion |
| 17. |
Two alternatives |
| 18. |
Alternative one-a separate Act - Alternative two-broadening the scale of "sale" in the Act |
| 19. |
The question of manner of levy |
| 20. |
Legislative devices |
| 21. |
What should be the limitations |
| 22. |
Definition of "sale" should cover transfers other than by sales |
| 23. |
Recommendation |
| 24. |
The complex nature of the problem |
| 25. |
The amendment will cover all consignments |
| 26. |
Constitutional amendment also needed |
| 27. |
"Sale of goods"-a composite expression |
| 28. |
Metaphorical use of sale |
| 29 |
How far legal concept extended |
| 30. |
The meaning of "sale" laid dawn in Simpson v. Conolly |
| 31. |
Wider definitions |
| 32,33. |
Essential concept-transfer of property |
| 34 to 36. |
The need to clarify the constitutional basis |
| 37. |
Past interpretation not a sure guide |
| 38. |
The common notion is different |
| 39. |
Recommendation to amend the Constitution |
| Chapter 3 |
Sales in The Course of Import-khosla's Case |
| 3.1 |
Scope of the Chapter |
| 2. |
Position before the Constitution |
| 3,4. |
Section 2(g) C.P. and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947 and its construction by the Supreme Court |
| 5. |
Other decisions of the Supreme Court |
| 6,7. |
Position under the Constitution |
| 8. |
Importance of the Constitutional prohibition |
| 9,10. |
Question of sale in the course of import |
| 11,12. |
Suggestions noted in earlier Report |
| 13. |
Background of the problem |
| 14. |
Article 286-width of |
| 15,16. |
First Travancore case |
| 17. |
Second Travancore case |
| 18. |
Word 'occasion' not intended to give a precise definition |
| 19,20. |
Effect of judgment in second Travancore case and Taxation Enquiry Commission |
| 21. |
Constitutional Amendment |
| 22 to 25. |
2nd Report of the Law Commission and Act of 1936 |
| 26. |
Law Commission's earlier Report (2nd Report) |
| 27. |
Section 5 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 implemented the law enunciated in the Travancore-Cochin case |
| 28. |
Wide meaning of 'occasion' |
| 29. |
Intention of majority in the second Travancore case |
| 30,31. |
Distinction between domestic sales and export sales |
| 32 to 35. |
Some pre-Khosla cases |
| 36. |
Distinction between "for export" and "in the course of export" |
| 37. |
Ben Gorm case |
| 38. |
The ratio in Ben Gorm case |
| 39. |
Knowledge of export does not make it an integral part |
| 40. |
The tests which were found inapplicable in Ben Gorm case |
| 41 to 45. |
Khosla's case-facts of |
| 46. |
Khosla's case summarised |
| 47. |
Case decided exclusively on section 5 |
| 48,49. |
30th Report |
| 50. |
Decisions after Khosla's case-import sales |
| 51. |
Application of Khosla's case to export sales |
| 52. |
Application of the principle to inter-State sales-a Kerala case |
| 53. |
Patna cases relating to inter-State sales |
| 54. |
A border line case |
| 55 to 57. |
Binani Brothers' case |
| 58. |
Two interpretations possible on the word 'occasion' |
| 59 to 61. |
'Occasion' and 'cause' |
| 62,63. |
Selection of cause implicit |
| 64. |
Direct cause nearest to legislative intention in section |
| 65 to 67. |
Sale after import intended to be excluded by Parliament |
| 68. |
Two propositions which will have to be given effect to |
| 69,70. |
Power to formulate a wide one |
| 71,72. |
Substitution of another word for the word "occasion" not possible |
| 73. |
Summary of The Principal Points Discussed In This Chapter |
| Chapter 4 |
Conflicting Decisions of The Courts as to The Central Sales Tax In Regard to The Scope of The Penal Provisions of That Act |
| 4.1 |
The close relationship with State laws under section 9(2) |
| 2. |
The resulting complexity |
| 3. |
Legislation by reference |
| 4,5. |
The question of applicability of State amendments |
| 6. |
Madras view |
| 7. |
The view of the majority of High Courts bound to prevail |
| 8. |
Desirability of amendment as regards construction of section 9(2) |
| 9. |
Constitutional position considered |
| 10 to 12. |
The principle in Shama Rao's case |
| 13. |
An analysis of the doctrine |
| 14. |
Three types of provisions in section 9(2) |
| 15. |
Alternatives for remedying the situation |
| 16. |
Recommendation for amendment of section 9(2) to insert date |
| 17. |
How far offences not listed in the Central Act covered |
| 18. |
Recommendation to add "offences" in section 9(2) |
| 19. |
Penalty under State law how far attracted-Calcutta case |
| 20. |
The principal considerations |
| 21. |
Insufficient importance attached to the word "penalties" |
| 22. |
Question of equality |
| 23 to 25. |
Observations of Supreme Court in N.K. Nataraja Mudaliar's case |
| 26. |
Express provision as to penalty desirable |
| 27. |
Recommendation |
| 28. |
Whole Act should be self-contained |
| Chapter 5 |
Punishment for Evasion of Sales Tax |
| 5.1 |
The question of mens rea with regard to offences |
| 2. |
Recommendations in Law Commission's 47th Report |
| 3,4. |
Amendment on above matters not recommended in taxation law |
| 5,6. |
Court decisions emphasise need for mens rea |
| 7. |
Provisions of direct tax laws considered |
| 8. |
The question of higher punishment for certain offences |
| 9. |
Recommendation to amend section 10, as to insert minimum punishment |
| 10. |
Adequacy of punishment-a Gujarat case |
| 11,12. |
Abetment |
| 13. |
Punishment of Corporations |
| 14. |
Recommendation to insert section 10C regarding Corporations |
| 15. |
Section 10D-Publication of names of convicted individuals |
| Chapter 6 |
Disposal of Excess Amounts Collected by a Dealer from a Customer as Sales Tax |
| 6.1 |
Collection of excess amount by dealers-No legislative competence in States |
| 2. |
Provisions for penalty held void in absence of procedural safeguard |
| 3. |
Case relating to U.P. Act |
| 4. |
Earlier cases relied on |
| 5. |
A case from Bihar |
| 6. |
Three aspects considered |
| 7. |
Liability of State |
| 8. |
Liability of the dealer |
| 9. |
Three parties involved |
| 10. |
State to secure restoration to citizen |
| 11. |
Constitutional position |
| 12. |
Parliament's power under the residuary power entry |
| 13. |
Precedent adopted in the Income-Tax Act and State Acts considered |
| 14. |
No need to provide administrative penalties |
| 15. |
Recommendation to enact separate law regarding amount illegally collected as taxes |
| 16. |
Criminal liability for overcharging tax |
| 17. |
Offence of cheating constituted by over-charging |
| 18. |
Overcharging whether amounts to a representation |
| 19. |
Representation as to a matter of law |
| 20. |
Significance of the "deceiving" |
| 21. |
Adequacy of law a desideratum |
| 22. |
Doubt as in provisions in State laws as to overcharging |
| Chapter 7 |
Establishment of Check-Posts for Preventing Evasion and Ensuring Better Collection of Taxes on The Sale of Goods |
| 7.1 |
Introductory |
| 2. |
Legislative entries |
| 3. |
Amplitude of the entries |
| 4. |
Suggestion referred to |
| 5. |
Judicial decisions-Andhra case |
| 6. |
Parliament competent to set up check-post under the Central Act |
| 7. |
Check-posts under State Sales Tax laws |
| 8. |
State Legislatures competent to establish check-posts |
| 9. |
Constitutional amendment not appropriate |
| 10. |
Check-posts in inter-State transactions-Rule struck down as dealing with inter-State transactions |
| 11. |
No constitutional difficulty |
| Chapter 8 |
Other Questions-definitions |
| 8.1 |
Introductory |
| 2. |
Meaning of "Customs frontiers" |
| 3. |
Position under the Customs Act, 1962 |
| 4. |
Difficulties caused by the present position |
| 5. |
Recommendations to define "crossing the customs frontiers" |
| 6. |
Expression used in the Customs Act, 1962 |
| 7. |
Section 5-Meaning of 'export' |
| 8. |
Case Law |
| 9. |
The question of modifying the position |
| 10. |
Reason justifying modification of the present interpretation of 'export' |
| 11,12. |
Other reasons |
| 13. |
Explanation regarding fuel |
| 14. |
Section 2(g)-'valuable consideration' in the definition of sale |
| 15. |
A Madras case |
| 16. |
Recommendation to amend section 2(g) |
| Chapter 9 |
Section 8 and The Rate of Tax |
| 9.1,2. |
Introductory |
| 3 to 7. |
Section 8(2)(b) |
|
Conclusion |
| Chapter 10 |
Retrospective Restrictions Under Article 286(3) |
| 10.1 |
Question whether legislation under Article 286 can be retrospective |
| 2. |
Amendment regarding coal |
| 3. |
Select Committee's observations |
| 4. |
Amendment illustrative of doubt on the subject |
| 5,6. |
No scope for devising suitable mechanism |
| Chapter 11 |
Conclusions |
| 11.1 |
Points dealt with |
| 2. |
Peculiarities of taxation and commodities |
| Chapter 12 |
Summary of Conclusions and Recommendations |
|
Point 1-definition of "Customs Frontiers" |
|
Point 2-sale of Fuel to International Carrier |
|
Point 3-section 2(0-definition of Sale and Element of Valuable Consideration |
|
Point 4-works Contracts |
|
Point 5-Hire-Purchase |
|
Point 6-consignments |
|
Point 7-sale of Controlled Commodities |
|
Point 8-supply of Goods By Clubs Etc |
|
Point 9-Import and Export-Khosia's Case |
|
Point 10-Reference To State Sales Tax Law-section 9, Central Sales Tax Act |
|
Point 11-Penalties-Section 9(2), Central Sales Tax Act |
|
Point 12-Central Sales Tax Act To Be Self-Contained |
|
Point 13-Punishment Under Section 10, Central Sales Tax Act |
|
Point 14-minimum Punishment-Relaxation of |
|
Point 15-Abetment-Proposer Section 10b, Central Sales Tax Act |
|
Point 16-corporations: Proposed Section 10c,Central Sales Tax Act |
|
Point 17-publication of Name of Convicted Individual |
|
Point 18-separate Law Regarding Amount Illegally Collected as Taxes |
|
Point 19-Check Posts |
|
Note By Member, Shri S.P. Sen-Varma |
|
Reference from the Government in April , 1973-Constitution (Sixth Amendment) Act, 1956 |
|
Power of Parliament to formulate principles |
|
No specific entry in the Constitution relating to taxes on sales or purchases in the course of export or import |
|
Exact question to be decided |
|
Importance of foreign trade in the interests of federal finance and of sales tax in the interests of State economy |
|
The first Travancore case (1952) |
|
The second Travancore case (1953) |
|
Complexity of the subject |
|
First reference to the Law Commission (1966) |
|
Khosla's case (1966) |
|
Second reference to the Law Commission (1966) |
|
My disagreement with the view taken by the majority on Khosla's case |
|
Difference between the effects of export and the effects import |
|
Care necessary even in exports |
|
Care to be taken in the use of language in legislative drafting |
|
Dealing with a twilight zone whose boundaries should be defined with care |
|
Suggestions for amendment of section |