Punjab Subordinate Courts | Arrears and Backing - Creating Additional Judicial (wo)manpower | Law Commission of India Reports | Law Library

Follow @SCJudgments

Report No. 245

Table X: Punjab Subordinate Courts
	2010	2011	2012	Average Institution	Average Rate of Disposal per Judge	Breakeven No.	Additional no. of Judges required to Breakeven	No. of cases pending 1 yr. on 31.12.2012	No. of Judges required for clearing backlog in
									1 year	2 years	3 years
Higher Judicial Service
Institution	70232	82091	124820	92381.0	937.4	98.6	6	43769	47	24	16
Disposal	62651	82398	117148
No. of Judges	87	99	93
RoD	720.1	832.3	1259.7
Subordinate Judicial Service
Institution	228420	314076	281114	274536.7	1097.9	250.1	.-71	252973	231	116	77
Disposal	236408	337256	303011
No. of Judges	217	267	322
RoD	1089.4	1263.1	941.0
Haryana Subordinate Courts
Higher Judicial Service
Institution	98499	117315	94335	103383.0	964.2	107.2	-2	54041	56	28	19
Disposal	86136	102806	85270
No. of Judges	98	83	110
RoD	878.9	1238.6	775.2
Subordinate Judicial Service
Institution	182591	241851	393333	272591.7	1179.1	231.2	.-51	25736	215	108	72
Disposal	193941	258395	396988
No. of Judges	173	249	288
RoD	1121.0	1037.7	1378.4
Chandigarh Subordinate Courts
Higher Judicial Service
Institution	5162	6131	6569	5954.0	992.1	6.0	1	4646	5	3	2
Disposal	4363	6293	7202
No. of Judges	6	6	6
RoD	727.2	1048.8	1200.3
Subordinate Judicial Service
Institution	21027	67805	39220	42684.0	3952.0	10.8	.-3	23923	7	3	2
Disposal	32482	86792	46710
No. of Judges	14	14	14
RoD	2320.1	6199.4	3336.4

Back

Information provided on advocatekhoj.com is solely available at your request for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement