AdvocateKhoj
Login : Advocate | Client
Home Post Your Case My Account Law College Law Library
    

Report No. 245

Table X: Punjab Subordinate Courts

2010

2011

2012

Average
Institution

Average
Rate of
Disposal per Judge

Breakeven
No.

Additional no. of
Judges required
to Breakeven

No. of
cases pending
1 yr. on
31.12.2012

No. of
Judges
required for
clearing backlog in

1 year

2 years

3 years

Higher Judicial Service
Institution

70232

82091

124820

92381.0

937.4

98.6

6

43769

47

24

16

Disposal

62651

82398

117148

No. of Judges

87

99

93

RoD

720.1

832.3

1259.7

Subordinate Judicial Service
Institution

228420

314076

281114

274536.7

1097.9

250.1

.-71

252973

231

116

77

Disposal

236408

337256

303011

No. of Judges

217

267

322

RoD

1089.4

1263.1

941.0

Haryana Subordinate Courts

Higher Judicial Service
Institution

98499

117315

94335

103383.0

964.2

107.2

-2

54041

56

28

19

Disposal

86136

102806

85270

No. of Judges

98

83

110

RoD

878.9

1238.6

775.2

Subordinate Judicial Service
Institution

182591

241851

393333



272591.7



1179.1



231.2



.-51



25736



215



108



72

Disposal

193941

258395

396988

No. of Judges

173

249

288

RoD

1121.0

1037.7

1378.4

Chandigarh Subordinate Courts

Higher Judicial Service
Institution

5162

6131

6569

5954.0

992.1

6.0

1

4646

5

3

2

Disposal

4363

6293

7202

No. of Judges

6

6

6

RoD

727.2

1048.8

1200.3

Subordinate Judicial Service
Institution

21027

67805

39220

42684.0

3952.0

10.8

.-3

23923

7

3

2

Disposal

32482

86792

46710

No. of Judges

14

14

14

RoD

2320.1

6199.4

3336.4



Arrears and Backing - Creating Additional Judicial (wo)manpower Back




Client Area | Advocate Area | Blogs | About Us | User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Advertise | Media Coverage | Contact Us | Site Map
powered and driven by neosys