AdvocateKhoj
Login : Advocate | Client
Home Post Your Case My Account Law College Law Library
    

Report No. 19

43. Section 41.- No change.

44. Section 42.-

In sub-section (1), the first proviso may be omitted as it is no longer necessary. The second proviso is also obsolete and should be omitted. In sub-section (2), the words "revenues of" should be omitted in view of the provisions of the Constitution relating to Consolidated Fund.







Client Area | Advocate Area | Blogs | About Us | User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Advertise | Media Coverage | Contact Us | Site Map
Powered by Neosys Inc
Information provided on advocatekhoj.com is solely available at your request for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement