State of Rajasthan
& Ors. Vs. Mahila Mandal (Udaipur)
O R D E R
Delay condoned. Leave
granted. Heard learned counsel for the appellants. The short grievance which
has been articulated by learned counsel for the State is that the Rules came
into force from 1st January, 1993 and the benefit could not have been given
from earlier period.
We agree with learned
counsel for the State. We modify the impugned judgment accordingly and direct that
the respondent(s) would be entitled to benefits from 1st January, 1993. We are quite
conscious of the fact that we are passing this order without giving notice to
the respondent(s) because the controversy is very limited and giving notice
would cause much greater financial hardship for the respondent(s).
In this view of the matter,
we are passing this order in absence of the respondent(s). In case the
respondent(s) is/are still aggrieved then the respondent(s) would be at liberty
to approach this Court. With this modification, the appeals are disposed of. No
costs.
...................J.
(DALVEER BHANDARI)
...................J.
(DEEPAK VERMA)
NEW
DELHI;
4TH
JULY, 2011
Back
Pages: 1 2