U.P. & Ors. Vs. M/S. Vam Organic Chemicals Ltd.  INSC 152 (26
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.1929 OF
2004 State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. ...Appellant(s) Versus M/s. Vam Organic
Chemicals Limited ...Respondent(s) W I T H Civil Appeal Nos.1930/2004,
1931-1932/2004, 1933/2004, 2810-2938/2004, 4298/2009, 4299/2009 and Civil
@ S.L.P. (C) No.6979/2010 @ CC 2279/2009
learned counsel on both sides.
granted in the special leave petition.
these matters, respondents are manufacturers of notified goods. These
respondents have been given central registration under Section 7 of the Central Sales Tax
Act, 1956, and also Recognition Certificate under
Section 4-B of the Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948, for purchase of high
speed diesel oil at concessional rate. These certificates have been given on
different dates by the appellants.
matter is State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. vs. M/s. Vam Organic Chemicals
Limited [Civil Appeal No.1929 of 2004].
Organic Chemicals Limited is a public limited company incorporated under the
Indian Companies Act, having it's registered office at Amroha, Uttar Pradesh.
It has established a continuous process chemical industry for the manufacture
of Vinyl Pyridine, Picoline, etc. [for short, `chemicals']. The said Company is
registered under the Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 [for short, `1948 Act'],
as well as under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 [for short, `1956 Act'], as a
Organic Chemicals Limited [for short, "Company"] was granted a
Registration Certificate under Section 7 of 1956 Act in which a List of Items
was annexed. As per the said List, the Company was entitled to purchase goods
under 1956 Act. The Company was also granted a Recognition Certificate under
Section 4-B of 1948 Act authorizing it to purchase goods on concessional rates.
On the basis of the Recognition Certificate granted by the State, the Company
became entitled to purchase various goods against Form III-B, which was issued
by the Assessing Authority on payment of concessional rate of tax. Since the
Company had obtained Registration Certificate under Section 7 of 1956 Act, it
purchased high speed diesel oil [`HSD', for short] against Form-C from Indian
Oil Corporation Limited. The Company had also bought HSD against Form III-B
from Indian Oil ...3/- - 3 - Corporation Limited under which Indian Oil
Corporation Limited charged the tax at the rate of two per cent against Form
June, 2000, a meeting was organised by the Principal Secretary, Finance, Uttar
Pradesh, in which a decision was taken that the benefit of Form III-B for
purchase of HSD to be used in Diesel Generating Sets in the factory should not
be given the benefit of concessional rate since such HSD was not directly used
in the manufacture of notified goods [chemicals]; rather, it was used for
generating electricity in the Generating Set which electricity was then
captively used for manufacturing chemicals. On the basis of the said decision
dated 12th June, 2000, the Additional Commissioner, Trade Tax, Meerut, Uttar
Pradesh, issued a Circular on 20th June, 2000, to all the subordinate officers
for it's implementation and, accordingly, all Trade Tax Authorities of the
State, who, at the relevant time, were under the administrative control of the
Commissioner, issued notices for deletion of HSD, an item mentioned in the
Company's Recognition Certificate. It is this show-cause notice which came to
be challenged by M/s.
Organic Chemicals Limited and others by filing writ petitions in the Allahabad
writ petition filed by the Company, it was submitted that HSD was a fuel, which
was absolutely essential for operating the Diesel Generating Set [D.G.
the factory as the Company's factory was engaged in a continuous process
chemical industry and, in the absence of HSD, the D.G. Set would become
non-functional ...4/- - 4 - and if electricity cannot be generated, it would be
impossible to produce chemicals. According to the Company, HSD is used in D.G.
Sets to generate electric energy which is required for chemical industry. In
this connection, reliance was placed on Explanation to Section 4-B of 1948 Act.
In reply, it was the case of the Department that HSD is used in the D.G. Set
for generating electric energy which is not only used for chemical industry but
is also used for electrical appliances in office, factory and to supply
electricity for working of lights, fans, etc. According to the Department, HSD
is used in the Generating Set for production of electricity;
unit of the Company was not registered/recognised for production of
electricity; that it was not a public utility service under the relevant
Electricity Act; and, hence, the Company cannot call HSD a fuel/raw-material
used for production of electricity in this case.
to the Department, in the present case, the notified goods consisted of
chemicals and not electricity, hence, HSD was not used in the process of
production of chemicals directly. For the afore-stated reasons, the Department
submitted that, on the facts and in the circumstances of this case, HSD cannot
be included in the Recognition Certificate of the Company. By the impugned
judgements, the High Court came to the conclusion that the stand of the
Department was highly technical. According to the High Court, HSD was used by
the Company for the manufacture of chemicals [notified goods], as mentioned in
Section 4-B(2) of 1948 Act. According to it, the word ...5/- - 5 -
"directly" is not mentioned in Section 4-B(2) of 1948 Act.
held that Section 4-B(2) of 1948 Act does not mention that the goods, referred
to in sub-section (1), should be used directly for the manufacture of the
notified goods. In the light of the said reasoning, the High Court came to the
conclusion, by the impugned judgements, that the show-cause notices issued by
the Department calling upon the Companies to show-cause as to why HSD should
not be deleted from the Recognition Certificate based on the Circulars dated
20th June, 2000, etc., be set aside. That, it was not open to the Department to
delete HSD, furnace oil, liquid fuels or gaseous fuels from the Recognition
Certificate as such oil [HSD] constituted a fuel required for the manufacture
of chemicals in terms of the Explanation to Section 4-B(2) of 1948 Act. Against
the said judgements, the State has come to this Court by above-mentioned civil
appeals. We may clarify that, in all, there are approximately 138 appeals
against the impugned judgements of the Allahabad High Court in various writ
petitions. Suffice it to state that common issue arises for determination in
this batch of cases, namely, Whether the Department was right in issuing
show-cause notices calling upon the Companies to show-cause as to why HSD
should not be deleted as an item from their respective Recognition Certificates
issued under Section 4-B(2) of 1948 Act? Mr. Sunil Gupta, learned senior
counsel appearing for the Department, invited our attention to Annexure CA(I)
of the Paper Book, which is a List of Items registered under Section 4-B of
1948 Act. It appears to ...6/- - 6 - be a List annexed to the Registration
Certificate. What is argued by the learned senior counsel is that, under
Section 4-B(2) of 1948 Act read with Explanation thereto, a dealer has to
satisfy the Assessing Authority, empowered to issue Recognition Certificate,
that he requires the duly itemised goods mentioned in the Recognition
Certificate for use in the manufacture by him of any notified goods [final
product]. According to the learned senior counsel, the Recognition Certificate,
including the List of Items under Section 4-B(2) of 1948 Act, cannot be read in
isolation. Each Item in the List is duly recognised by the Assessing Authority
looking to its requirement for use in the manufacture of the final product [notified
goods]. In this connection, it was submitted that HSD does find place in the
said List but if the said Item is used to make the Generating Set functional
for generating electric energy which, in turn, is captively consumed in the
manufacture of chemical goods, then, in that event, an assessee will not be
entitled to the benefit of concessional rate of tax.
counsel invited our attention to several items in the said List, including
air-conditioners, stabilizers, electrical panels and Diesel Generating Set. It
was argued on behalf of the Department that if HSD is used in the Generating
Set, it would not amount to it being used in the manufacture of chemical goods
but it would amount to HSD being used to operate the machines. On the other
hand, it was urged on behalf of the assessee(s) that, in the absence of HSD, it
was not possible to operate the ...7/- - 7 - D.G. Set; that, the assessee(s)
has installed several D.G.
it's factory for the manufacture of electricity which Sets cannot function
without the use of HSD.
to the assessee(s), there is nothing in sub- section (2) of Section 4-B of 1948
Act to suggest that HSD should be used directly in the manufacture of chemical
goods. In any event, according to the assessee(s), in the List enclosed with
the Recognition Certificate, Diesel Generating Set is mentioned. Therefore,
HSD, in any event, is directly used to operate Diesel Generating Set.
argued on behalf of the assessee(s) is that, if D.G. Set is an item duly
recognised by the Assessing Authority, the machines cannot operate without the
use of HSD and, in the circumstances, there is, in any event, a direct use of
HSD in the working of the D.G. Set. As stated above, the High Court has
accepted the contentions advanced on behalf of the assessee(s).
outset, we quote hereinbelow Section 4-B(2) with the Explanation as also
Section 4-B(4)(ii) of 1948 Act:
Specific Relief to certain manufacturers.--  xxx xxx xxx  Where a dealer
requires any goods, referred to in sub-section (1) for use in the manufacture
by him in the State, of any notified goods, or in the packing of such notified
goods manufactured or processed by him, and such notified goods are intended to
be sold by him in the State or in the course of inter-State trade or commerce
or in the course ...8/- - 8 - of export out of India, he may apply to the
assessing authority in such form and manner and within such period as may be
prescribed, for the grant of a recognition certificate in respect thereof, and
if the applicant satisfies such requirements including requirement of
depositing late fee, and conditions as may be prescribed, the assessing
authority shall grant to him in respect of such goods a recognition certificate
in such form and subject to such conditions, as may be prescribed.
For the purposes of this sub- section-- [a] `goods required for use in the
manufacture' shall mean raw materials, processing materials, machinery, plant,
equipment, consumable stores, spare parts, accessories, components,
sub-assemblies, fuels or lubricants; and [b] `notified goods' means such goods
as may, from time to time be notified by the State Government in that behalf.
The assessing authority may amend a recognition certificate granted under sub-
section (2), either of its own motion or on the application of the dealer,
where the dealer has changed the name or place of his business or has closed
down any branch or has opened a branch or for any other sufficient reason:
that no recognition certificate shall be cancelled or amended by Assessing
Authority of its own motion except after reasonable opportunity of being heard
has been given to the dealer."
looking at the present controversy from a different point of view. The High
Court has not examined, in the present case, the nature of the power exercised
by ...9/- - 9 - the Assessing Authority under Section 4-B(4)(ii) of 1948 Act.
This point of view arises because, in this case(s), a show-cause notice has
been issued to the assessee calling upon the assessee to show-cause as to why
HSD mentioned in its Recognition Certificate should not be deleted as it is
being used for generating electricity in the Generating Set which electricity
is then consumed by the factory. A number of writ petitions were filed in the
Allahabad High Court against the show-cause notices. The High Court intervened
at the show-cause notice stage. If one looks at Section 4-B(4)(ii) of 1948 Act,
one finds that the Assessing Authority is vested with discretionary power to
amend the Recognition Certificate granted under sub-section (2) of Section 4-B
of 1948 Act either on its own motion or on the application of the dealer where
the dealer has changed his name or place of business or has closed down his
branch office or for any other sufficient reason. By way of proviso, it has
been clarified that no Recognition Certificate shall be cancelled or amended by
the Assessing Authority on it's own motion without giving reasonable
opportunity of being heard to the dealer [assessee]. If one looks at the Scheme
of Section 4-B of 1948 Act, one finds that a statutory power is given to the
Assessing Authority to issue the Recognition Certificate in respect of the
notified goods. There could be a number of notified goods. In fact, in 1998,
"electricity" itself was one of the notified goods. In our view,
under the Scheme of Section 4-B(2) of 1948 Act, the Assessing Authority is
vested with the statutory power to issue ...10/- - 10 - Recognition Certificate
in respect of items enumerated therein, which are required by the dealer for
use in the manufacture of any notified goods. In the present case, the
assessee(s) is manufacturing chemical goods. On issuance of the Recognition
Certificate, a concessional rate of tax becomes applicable in respect of items
enumerated in such certificate. It is a conditional exemption which is given to
the dealer [assessee]. It is important to bear in mind that a Recognition
Certificate is issued under Section 4-B of 1948 Act in respect of notified
goods [See sub-section (2A) of Section 4-B].
grant exemption from payment of duty or to pay concessional duty is expressly
conferred on the Assessing Authority. It is a case of conditional exemption.
While exercising that power, generally no hearing or reasons are required to be
given unless the Act so provides. In this case, a proviso is inserted in
Section 4-B(4)(ii) of 1948 Act to say that no Recognition Certificate shall be
cancelled or amended by the Assessing Authority without giving reasonable
opportunity of being heard to the dealer. It is for this reason that, in the
present case, the Assessing Authority has given show-cause notices to all the
respondent-dealers calling upon them to show-cause as to why HSD, as an item,
should not be deleted from the Recognition Certificate.
present case, the Department submitted, before us, that, by mistake, HSD has
been included in the List. The Department seeks to rectify that mistake. The
question, before us, is - whether the Department is ....11/- - 11 - precluded
from doing so? This question has not been answered by the High Court. In our
view, under Section 4- B(4)(ii) of 1948 Act, the Assessing Authority is vested
with discretionary power to amend a Recognition Certificate granted under
sub-section (2) of Section 4-B of 1948 Act either on it's own motion or on the
application of the dealer for any sufficient reason. This pre-condition of
"sufficiency of reasons" requires a show- cause notice to be given to
the dealer in whose favour a Recognition Certificate exists calling upon him to
show- cause as to why an item should not be deleted in a given case. Therefore,
in our view, each case needs to be examined by the Assessing Authority if it
seeks to exercise it's authority to delete an item from a Recognition
Certificate. Same is the position if the Assessing Authority seeks to cancel a
Recognition Certificate for the reasons indicated in the said sub- section. Not
only that, while amending or cancelling a Recognition Certificate, the
Assessing Authority is also required to give reasons for amending or cancelling
the existing Recognition Certificate or for deleting an item there from.
aspect needs to be highlighted.
proviso to Section 4-B(4)(ii) of 1948 Act, the words used are "no
recognition certificate shall be cancelled or amended by Assessing Authority of
its own motion except after reasonable opportunity of being heard". It is
important to note that the word "rectification" does ...12/- - 12 -
not find place in the said proviso. Conceptually, the word
"rectification" is different from the word "amendment".
This point is relevant because, in the present case, the stand of the
Department is that HSD is inserted in the Recognition Certificate by mistake.
The Department seeks to delete that item on the ground of mistake. That would
not be possible. When a Recognition Certificate is issued, a benefit of
concessional rate of tax is given to the dealer. He arranges his business
affairs on those lines. Therefore, that benefit cannot be withdrawn
retrospectively. Such benefit can be withdrawn, at the highest, from the date
of the show-cause notice when the Assessing Authority proposes to delete an
item from the Recognition Certificate. In our view, such a show-cause notice
has been given in each of the cases before us. Accordingly, we construe such
show-cause notice to be for amending the Recognition Certificate in the facts and
circumstances of this case, particularly because, in some of the cases, we find
that Recognition Certificates have been issued as far back as in 1980.
reasons given hereinabove, we remit all these cases to the Assessing Authority
with a direction to treat the show-cause notice(s) issued for the purposes of
amending the existing Recognition Certificate(s). Each assessee will be given a
hearing. Each case for amendment of Recognition Certificate will be decided in
accordance with the procedure laid down in Section 4-B(4)(ii) of 1948 Act. The
Assessing Authority will decide each case on ...13/- - 13 - it's own merits
uninfluenced by the decision of the High- Power Committee dated 12th June,
2000. It will also decide each of such cases uninfluenced by Circulars issued
by the Additional Commissioner dated 20th June, 2000, and others.
Assessing Officer will decide each case on it's own merits uninfluenced by the
observations made by the High Court in the impugned judgements.
clarification needs to be mentioned. In some of these cases, pursuant to the
show- cause notice(s), the Assessing Authority has also passed adjudication
orders in terms of the Circulars issued by the Commissioner. In view of our
order herein, we direct the Assessing Officer to decide these cases de novo on
the basis of the show-cause notices and also uninfluenced by the observations
made in the orders of adjudication earlier. In each case, the Assessing Officer
will give a reasoned order. However, if an order amending the Recognition
Certificate is issued by the Assessing Authority, the same will operate only
from the date of issuance of show-cause notice.
to what is stated hereinabove, this batch of civil appeals filed by the State
of Uttar Pradesh stand disposed of with no order as to costs.
......................J. [S.H. KAPADIA]
......................J. [AFTAB ALAM]
February 26, 2010.