Commr. of Central
Excise Vs. M/S Shanmugananda Soapnut Works  INSC 1579 (17 September 2008)
JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.6011-6013 OF 2007 Commr. of Central Excise
...Appellant(s) Versus M/s. Shanmugananda Soapnut Works ...Respondent(s) ORDER
Repeatedly this Court has observed that in cases in which excisability is in
issue, the Department should insist on the examination of the process
undertaken by the assessee in the manufacture of a given product. Despite our saying
so, repeatedly, the Department is not insisting on examining the process. This
is one more such case.
In the present case,
the investigation revealed that the respondent-assessee, M/s. Shanmugananda
Soapnut Works, was engaged in the manufacture of Shikakai powder by crushing
shigekai pods and 'Reeta' mixed in preparation of 10:1. Despite the said
revelation made in the course of investigation, the show cause notice has not
even alleged that the assessee is engaged in the manufacture of Shikakai ...2/-
-2- powder by
crushing shigekai pods and 'Reeta' being mixed and, consequently, the entire
adjudication stands derailed. Further, it may be stated that mixing of 'Reeta'
has been held to constitute manufacture in numerous judgments. But, in this
case, the respondent-assessee has specifically averred that they are merely
powdering shigekai pods and that they do not add any herbal material thereto.
Lastly, in the present case, the adjudication authority has not insisted on examining
the process undertaken by the assessee in conversion of the pods into powder.
We may state that
there are other conjoint matters in which we are informed that the cases
involved mixture of Reeta into Shikakai powder. However, as stated above, this is
not the case in the present matter.
Therefore, for want
of allegations in the show cause notice and for want of specific findings with
regard to use of Reeta in the powder, we do not wish to interfere on the facts
of the present case. We make it very clear that those cases in which Reeta is
added to the powder stand on a ...3/- C.A.Nos.6011-6013/07..contd..
-3- different footing
and we do not wish to comment about those cases herein.
Subject to above,
Civil Appeals stand dismissed with no order as to costs.
(B. SUDERSHAN REDDY)