State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Compotar  INSC 408 (10 March 2008)
Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT & P. SATHASIVAM CIVIL APPEAL NO 1868 OF 2008 (Arising out of SLP (C) 25771/2007) Dr. ARIJIT
1. Leave granted.
2. Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by a Division Bench of
the Allahabad High Court directing the appellant to deposit the entire amount
awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Special Judge, Mathura in MACC
No. 431 of 2005. It was directed that the amount was to be invested and paid to
the claimantrespondent No.1 in accordance with the directions of the Tribunal.
3. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that a detailed, frivolous
and false claim was lodged. It was submitted that a bare look at the factual
scenario would go to show that the claim has no foundation. The accident
purportedly took place on 24.12.2000, the FIR was lodged on 31.5.2001 and in
December, 2005 a Claim Petition claiming compensation under provisions of Motor
Vehicles Act, 1988 (in short the 'Act') was filed.
4. Overlooking these facts, Tribunal awarded compensation of Rs.8,11,351/-
alongwith interest at the rate of 6% from the date of filing of the claim
petition till the date of actual payment. While admitting the appeal the High
Court, according to the appellant should not have directed deposit of the
entire amount and should not have permitted the claimant to be paid the amount
5. Notice has not yet been issued in this matter but we feel that the
impugned order of the High Court is practically unreasoned and no reason has
been indicated as to why the High Court felt that the amount was to be paid to
the claimant on deposit. Therefore, we direct the High Court to re consider the
matter and pass fresh order.
6. We have passed this order to avoid unnecessary delay and inconvenience to
7. The appeal is accordingly disposed of.
Pages: 1 2 3