Engineering Service Technocrats & Co Vs. Executive Engineer and Ors  Insc
295 (26 February 2008)
Chatterjee & Harjit Singh Bedi
APPEAL NO. 4683 OF 2004 WITH CIVIL APPEAL Nos. 4684/2004, 4685/2004, 4713/2004,
4714/2004 AND 4715/2004 TARUN CHATTERJEE, J.
These appeals are directed against the common final judgment and order dated
12th of September, 2003 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in M.F.A. Nos. 1466-1468 of 1998.
common reasoned award passed by the learned Arbitrator on 23rd of May, 1996
under the Arbitration Act, 1940 (in short 'the Act') and made a rule of the
court by the Civil Court on 20th of December, 1997 was set aside in its
entirety by the High Court only on the ground that the arbitrator had
erroneously decided the issue whether the claims preferred by the appellant
were barred by limitation. It is on record that the entire matter was remitted
by the High Court, despite the lapse of over 10 years since the reference was
made, to a different arbitrator for a fresh decision on merits.
our view, the judgment of the High Court is not sustainable in law and the
objections filed by the respondent-State against the award ought to have been
entertained by the Civil Court despite there being a considerable delay in
filing the same and in spite of the fact that there was, in the first instance,
no application for condonation of delay. For this purpose, we have looked into
the explanations given in the application for condonation of delay in filing
the objection under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. We are of the view that
the explanations offered do constitute sufficient cause in filing the objection
under Section 33 of the Act. In this view of the matter, we set aside the
judgment of the High Court as well as of the trial court and the matter may be
remitted back to the trial court for decision on the objection filed under
Section 33 of the Act. The objection under section 33 of the Act shall be
decided by the trial Court positively within six months from the date of supply
of a copy of this order to it after giving hearing to the parties and after
passing a reasoned order in accordance with law.
the reasons aforesaid, the appeals are allowed to the extent indicated above.
There will be no order as to costs.
Pages: 1 2