Gupta & Ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra  INSC 2091 (4 December 2008)
JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 375 OF 2002 SATISH OMPRAKASH GUPTA & ORS.
.. APPELLANTS vs.
Having heard learned
counsel for the parties, we are satisfied that the conviction so far as
Omprakash Banarasdas Gupta and Kaushalya Omprakash Banarasdas Gupta - Appellant
Nos. 2 and 3 are concerned, cannot be maintained in view of the unsatisfactory
nature of the evidence. So far as appellant No.1-Satish Omprakash Gupta is
concerned, we find that the courts below have analyzed the evidence correctly
to find him guilty. However, the sentence is reduced to six months on each
The appeal is allowed
to aforesaid extent.
The bail bonds for
the purpose of grant of bail, so far as appellant Nos.2 and 3 are concerned,
shall stand discharged. The appellant No.-1 shall surrender to custody
forthwith for undergoing the remaining period of sentence.
(Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT)
Pages: 1 2 3