Login : Advocate | Client
Home Post Your Case My Account Law College Law Library

Supreme Court Judgments

Latest Supreme Court of India Judgments 2023


RSS Feed img

Vimalchandra D. Desai & ANR. Vs. Pune Municipal Corpn. & Ors. [2008] INSC 2235 (18 December 2008)


CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.7416 OF 2008 (Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.14591 of 2006) Vimalchandra D. Desai & Anr. ...Appellant(s) Versus Pune Municipal Corporation & Ors. ...Respondent(s) O R D E R Leave granted.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Maharashtra, allowed the complaint and awarded compensation of Rupees four lakhs together with interest thereon at the rate of nine per cent per annum from the date of filing of the complaint, i.e., 20th April, 2000, till realisation. Against the said order, when the matter was taken in appeal, the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission [for short, "National Commission"] enhanced the compensation to Rs.6,54,2000/- and after taking note of the fact that Respondent No.1, Pune Municipal Corporation has already paid Rs.50,000/-, directed that Aundh Sports Club, Respondent No.4 herein, shall pay the remaining amount of Rs.6,04,000/- within four weeks. The National Commission further directed ...2/- -2- that in case Respondent No.4 fails to pay the amount, Respondent Nos.5-8 herein shall be jointly and severely liable to pay the amount with the rider that in the event of failure of respondents to pay the amount within four weeks, the appellants shall be entitled to interest at the rate of nine per cent per annum.

Feeling dis-satisfied with the order of the National Commission, the complainants have preferred this appeal by special leave.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants submitted that while determining the compensation at Rs.6,54,000/-, the National Commission has made a mistake in calculating the compensation and, as a matter of fact, the compensation should have been assessed at Rs.7,92,000/-. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the private respondents stated that he is not in a position to dispute this fact.

In view of the above, we hold that the appellants are entitled to a sum of Rs.7,92,000/- by way of compensation and after deducting Rs.50,000/- already paid by Respondent No.1, a sum of Rs.7,42,000/- is payable to them. We are further of the view that the National Commission was not justified in not awarding interest to the appellants with effect from the date of filing of the complaint.

Accordingly, the appeal is allowed in-part. It is held that the enhanced compensation payable in terms of the order of the National Commission is Rs.7,92,000/- and not Rs.6,54,000/-. After deducting Rs.50,000/- paid by the Pune Municipal Corporation, Respondent Nos.4 to 8 are directed to pay to the appellants a sum of Rs.7,42,000/- together with interest thereon at the rate of nine per cent per annum from the date ...3/- -3- of filing of the complaint, i.e., 20th April, 2000, till date of payment within a period of four months by an account payee demand draft upon a local branch of the scheduled Bank. While doing so, they shall be entitled to adjust the amount already paid to the appellants.

......................J. [B.N. AGRAWAL]

......................J. [G.S. SINGHVI]

......................J. [RAJENDRA MAL LODHA]

New Delhi,

December 18, 2008.


Pages: 1 2 3 

Client Area | Advocate Area | Blogs | About Us | User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Advertise | Media Coverage | Contact Us | Site Map
powered and driven by neosys