Mahendra & Ors Vs. State of Uttaranchal & Anr  Insc 21 (9 January 2007)
Arijit Pasayat & S.H. Kapadia (Arising out of Slp(Crl.) No. 2893 of 2006) Dr.
Arijit Pasayat, J.
in this appeal is to the order passed by a learned Single Judge of the Uttranchal
High Court dismissing the Criminal Miscellaneous Applications. The High Court
took exception to the fact that two petitions were filed in respect of the same
impugned order. According to the High Court the appellants had concealed the
fact that the second petition had been filed while the first petition was
facts in a nutshell are as follows:
Misc. Application No.4279 of 1998 was filed by the appellants before the Allahabad
High Court. After bifurcation of the State the said case was transferred to the
Uttranchal High Court and was re- numbered as Criminal Misc. Application No.953
of 2001. It appears that there was another petition filed which was numbered as
No. 4435 of 1998 and the same was re-numbered as Criminal Misc. Application No.
950 of 2001. The High Court was of the view that Criminal Misc. Application No.
4435 of 1998 corresponding to Criminal Misc. Application No. 950 of 2001 was
filed earlier and when the appellants failed to get an order of stay they filed
the second petition suppressing the fact that one earlier petition was pending.
In the second petition the appellants got an order of stay. This according to
the High Court was a depreciable practice.
counsel for the appellants submitted that the confusion arose because the
latter petition i.e. Criminal Misc. Application No. 4435 of 1998 was renumbered
as Criminal Misc. Application 950 of 2001 while the earlier petition i.e.
Criminal Misc. Application No. 4279 of 1998 was re-numbered as Criminal Misc.
Application No. 953 of 2001. It is pointed out that the said petition was filed
on 6.10.1998 and there was an interim order passed in the said case. It is
submitted that by mistake the advocate's clerk filed exact copy of the earlier
petition which was numbered as Criminal Misc.
No. 4435 of 1998. The same was filed at a latter date. In this background it
was submitted that there was no suppression and in fact there was no reason to
mislead the Hon'ble
contra learned counsel for the State submitted that the appellants have not
explained satisfactorily as to under what circumstances two similar
applications were filed.
find that in fact the confusion arose because the petition filed later was
renumbered as Criminal Misc. Application No. 950 of 2001 while the petition
filed earlier, in which the order of stay granted on 23.12.1998, was
re-numbered as Criminal Misc. Application No. 953 of 2001.
counsel for the appellants has submitted that the filing of the second
application was on account of confusion and the same in fact was not pressed.
peculiar circumstances of the case we are satisfied that the filing of the
second application was on account of a bona fide mistake and the confusion
arose because of the fact that the second criminal application was renumbered
as Crl. Misc. Application 950 of 2001 while the earlier petition was
re-numbered as 953 of 2001. In the aforesaid background we set aside the order
of the High Court and remit the matter to the High Court for fresh
consideration on merits. Since the learned counsel for the appellant has stated
that Criminal Misc. Application No. 4435 of 1998 was not pressed, the same need
not be considered by the High Court.
we part with the case, it has to be noted that several instances have come to
our notice that several petitions of similar nature are being filed without
disclosing that earlier a petition had been filed. It would be therefore
appropriate for the High Courts to make provision in the relevant Rules that in
every petition it shall be clearly stated as to whether any earlier petition
had been filed and/or is pending in respect of the same cause of action. It
shall also be indicated as to what was the result of the earlier petition. If
this procedure is followed, the confusion of the kind which has surfaced in
this case can be ruled out.
appeal is disposed of.