of Customs, Chennai Vs. M/S Hewlett Packard India Sales (P) Ltd  Insc 883 (30 August 2007)
Arijit Pasayat & Lokeshwar Singh Panta
APPEAL NO. 5854 OF 2006 Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.
Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by the Customs Excise and
Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench, Chennai (in short 'CESTAT')
allowing the appeal filed by the respondent. By the impugned judgment CESTAT
held that the Software-loaded Hard Discs are classifiable under Heading 85.24
of the First Schedule to Customs Tariff Act, 1985 (in short 'Tariff Act'). It
was further held that respondent will be eligible for duty exemption under
Notification No.21/2002-Cus as amended. It was held that rest of the machine
would be classified under Heading 84.71.
Background facts in a nutshell are as follows:
Department had demanded customs duty of about Rs.5.9 crores from the respondent
by classifying goods imported by them under Heading 84.71 of the First Schedule
of the Act and denying them benefit of exemption Notification No.21/2000-Cus. dated
1.3.2002 (as amended). Demand was questioned before CESTAT. An application
seeking waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in respect of this amount of
duty was filed. After examining the records and hearing both sides, CESTAT
found prima facie case for the assessee in view of the Tribunal's decision in
the case of Barber Ship 456 (Tri.) as well as the decision in the assessee's
own case reported in 2005 (126) ECR 124 (Tri-Del) and, accordingly, CESTAT have
dispensed with pre-deposit of the duty amount.
having heard both sides at length and having regard to the high stake involved
in the case, the appeal was taken up for final disposal.
respondents are engaged in the manufacture of, and trading in, computers
including Laptops (otherwise called 'Notebooks') falling under Heading 84.71 of
the CTA Schedule.
imported Notebooks (Laptops) with Hard Disc Drivers (Hard Discs, for short)
preloaded with Operating Software like Windows XP, XP Home etc. These computers
were also accompanied by separate Compact Discs (CDs) containing the same
software, which were intended to be used in the event of Hard Disc failure. The
Bills of Entry filed by the importer declared the value of Laptop and the value
of Software separately, the software value including the Hard Disc value also.
The Bills of Entry classified the Software-loaded Hard Discs under Heading
85.24 of the CTA Schedule and claimed exemption in terms of Sl. No.157 of
Notification No.21/2002- Cus ibid. These Bills of Entry were filed with the
Chennai Air Customs Authorities in July 2005. Long before this, by a letter
dated 7.10.2003 the respondents had informed the Addl. Commissioner of Customs,
Chennai that they would be filing Bills of Entry for separate assessment of
Computers and Software-loaded Hard Discs in view of the Tribunal's decision in
Barber Ship Management's case (supra). It was also informed that they would
claim duty exemption under Sl. No.157 of Notification No.21/2002-Cus. ibid.
Subsequently, under cover of letter dated 11.10.2003, the respondents had also
supplied to the Addl. Commissioner the OEM pricelist for the various models of
'Notebooks' imported by them. They had also provided a worksheet indicating
separately the value of Hard Disc, value of Operating Software and the CD &
meantime, at Delhi, they had imported Laptop computers
with Hard Discs preloaded with Software and claimed classification of the
Software-loaded Hard Disc Drives under Heading 85.24. The department issued a
show-cause notice for demanding duty on these goods in terms of Heading 84.71.
This demand was confirmed by the original authority, against which appeal
before the Commissioner (Appeals) was preferred, who sustained the decision of
the lower authority.
the appeal preferred to the Tribunal was allowed and it was held that the Hard
Disc Drives preloaded with software required to be assessed separately in terms
of 85.24 of the CTA Schedule by virtue of Note 6 to Chapter 85 of the said
Schedule vide Final order No.380/2005-NB-A dated 11.10.2004 reported in 2005
(126) ECR 124 (Tri-Del).
the Appraising Officer at Chennai Air Customs, dealing with the goods in
question, queried the respondents as to why the value of the Hard Discs should
not be included in the value of the 'Notebooks' for the purpose of assessment
under Heading 84.71. The respondents replied by pointing out that, in terms of
the Tribunal's decision in Barber Ship Management's case (supra) which had been
upheld by this Court as reported in 2002 (144) ELT A293, the Software- loaded
Hard Discs could only be classified under Heading 85.24. They also cited, in
support of their stand, Final Order No.380/2005-NB-A dated 11.10.2004 (supra)
passed by the Tribunal in their own case. Their arguments, however, did not
weigh with the assessing authority, which proceeded to assess the Bills of
Entry on a provisional basis. The jurisdictional Asst. Commissioner of Customs,
after hearing the party and considering their submissions, found Hard Disc as
integral part of Notebook-computer and accordingly passed Order-in- Original
dated 31.10.2005 classifying the Notebooks together with the Hard Discs
assembled therein, under Heading 84.71 as 'automatic data processing machines'.
This order was upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals) as per Order-in-Appeal
dated 25.11.2005. It is on the basis of the appellate Commissioner's order that
the assessments were finalized.
the demand of duty which is on the assessable value comprising the value of the
Notebook computers with Hard Discs excluding the value of Software. Appeals
were preferred against the appellate Commissioner's order.
Stand of respondent before the Tribunal revolved round decision in Barber Ship
Management's case (supra) which was affirmed by this Court in [202 (144) ELT A
293]. It was pointed out that, in their own case involving import of similar
goods at Delhi, the Tribunal had classified
Software-loaded Hard Disc Drives under Heading 85.24. It was argued that the
issue arising in this case had already been conclusively decided by this Court
in the case of Barber Ship Management's case (supra) and, therefore, there was
nothing further to be examined in this case. It was submitted that Software-loaded
Hard Disc, being "recorded media for sound or other similarly recorded
phenomenaexcluding products of Chapter 37" was to be classified under
Heading 85.24. The department had no objection to classifying Software-recorded Hard Disc Drive, if imported without any other
apparatus, under Heading 85.24.
the lower authorities should have been taken the aid of Note 6 to Chapter 85
for classifying the Software-loaded Hard Disc Drives under heading 85.24.
Reference was also made to the HSN Notes under Heading 85.24. It was submitted
that the authorities below had failed to note the clear distinction between
Computer and Software despite decisions of this Court on the point. In this
connection, reference was made to ELT 289]. The ratio of the Supreme Court's
decision in the ELT 6 (SC)] was wrongly applied to the facts of the case by the
lower appellate authority.
While issuing notice this Court noted that the matter appeared to be covered by
3-Judge Bench's decision of this Court in Commissioner of Central Excise, Pondicherry v. ACER India Ltd. (2004 (8) SCC
173). But it was contended by learned Additional Solicitor General that the
question whether Hard Discs fitted to the Computer would be treated as a
Software was not specifically dealt with in the said case. Notice was issued
and the matter was listed for final hearing.
short question which arises for determination in this civil appeal is : Whether
operating systems (software) which controls the working of the computer and
which is preloaded in the laptop (notebook) is classifiable as a separate
entity under CTH 85.24 at 'nil' rate of duty or as an integral part of the
laptop under CTH 84.71 at the appropriate rate of duty.
answer the above question CTH 85.24 and CTH 84.71 need to be quoted:
recorded with sound or similar recording, whether or not presented together
with the apparatus for which they are intended or assembled with constituent
parts of machines of heading 84.69 to 84.72 (e.g. disc packs) are in all cases
to be classified in this heading."
84.71 "Automatic data processing machines and units thereof; magnetic or
optical reader, machines for transcribing data on to data media in coded form
and machines for processing such data, not elsewhere specified or
Department has classified the laptop as a machine in CTH 84.71 and has demanded
duty on the assessable value determined by deducting the software value from
the total value of the laptop whereas the assessee has classified the software
loaded Hard Disk Drive (for short, 'HDD') under CTH 85.24 separately from the
laptop and has claimed the benefit of Notification No.21/2002-Cus dated
answer the above controversy meaning of the words software, hard disk and
platter need to be noted (See: Computer Dictionary by Microsoft - Fifth Edition
at pp.489, 246 and 408 respectively):
disk. A device containing one or more inflexible platters coated with material
in which data can be recorded magnetically, together with their read/write
heads, the head- positioning mechanism, and the spindly motor in a sealed case
that protects against outside contaminants. The protected environment allows
the head to fly 10 to 25 millionths of an inch above the surface of a platter
rotating typically at 3600 to 7200 rpm; therefore, much more data can be stored
and accessed much more quickly than on a floppy disk. Most hard disks contain
from two to eight platters. See the illustration. Also called: hard disk drive.
disk drive n. See hard disk Platter. One of the individual metal data storage
disks within a hard disk drive. Most hard disks have from two to eight
platters. See the illustration. See also hard disk.
Computer programs; instructions that make hardware work. Two main types of
software are system software (operating systems), which controls the workings
of the computer, and applications, such as word processing programs,
spreadsheets, and databases, which perform the tasks for which people use
computers. Two additional categories, which are neither system nor application
software but contain elements of both, are network software, which enables
groups of computers to communicate, and language software, which provides
programmers with the tools they need to write programs. In addition to these
task-based categories, several types of software are described based on their
method of distribution. These include packaged software (canned programs), sold
primarily through retail outlets; freeware and public domain software, which
are distributed free of charge; shareware, which is also distributed free of
charge; although users are requested to pay a small registration fee for
continued use of the program; and vaporware, software that is announced by a
company or individuals but either never makes it to market or is very late.
also application, canned software, freeware, network software, operating
system, shareware, system software, vaporware, Compare firmware, hardware, liveware."
the basis of the above dictionary meanings it becomes clear that a software is
a computer programme. It consists of instructions that make hardware work.
There are two types of softwares, namely, system software which controls the
working of the computer and application software such as word processing programmes,
databases etc., which perform the tasks for which we use computers. In
addition, we now have network software which enables groups of computers to
communicate, and language software which provides programmers with the tools
with which they write programmes. We also have what is called as packaged softwares
which are sold through retail outlets. In the present case, the respondent
imported laptops containing preloaded HDD. The said drives were preloaded with
operating systems (software) which, as stated above, controls the working of
the computer. The value of the laptop depends on the operating system, which is
preloaded. The computer cannot open without the operating system. The laptop
without an operating system is like an empty building. At this stage, it may be
clarified that the operating system can also be imported as a packaged software
which is like an accessory and which in the present case is classified by the
department under CTH 85.24.
a preloaded operating system recorded on HDD is an integral part of the laptop
(unit). Such preloaded operating system on the HDD forms an integral part of
the laptop. It is important to note that laptop as a stand alone unit is
classifiable under CTH 84.71. A laptop is a small portable Personal Computer
(in short 'PC'). It runs either on battery or electricity. Laptop has a screen
and a small key board. Most of the laptops run on the same software as their
desk top counterparts. Most of the laptops accept floppy disks, CD ROM Drives, External
or Internal Modem etc. A notebook computer is a laptop. It is a machine. A CD
or a floppy disk is a peripheral.
Applying the above tests to the facts of the present case, we are of the view
that preloaded operating system recorded in HDD in the laptop (which is the
item of import) forms an integral part of the laptop. What was imported in the
present case was a laptop as a stand alone item (unit). Present dispute relates
to the transaction value of the unit. An importer who buys a laptop containing
an operating system pays for the laptop as a unit. As stated above, without the
operating system, like Windows, the laptop cannot work. The computer cannot
open without operating system. In the present case, the respondent has not only
imported laptops, it has also imported HDDs on which the operating system was
recorded (packaged software) which has been classified by the Department under
CTH 85.24. However, when a laptop is imported with in-built preloaded operating
system recorded on HDD the said item forms an integral part of the laptop
(computer system) and in which case the Department is right in treating the
laptop as one single unit imported by the respondent. The Department has
rightly classified the laptop as a unit under CTH 84.71, quoted above.
Before concluding it may be pointed out that in none of the decisions cited on
behalf of the respondent, the question raised in the present dispute was ever
raised. Although laptop is similar PC, the former is more compact. It cannot be
assembled as easily as PC. In the present case, the Department has rightly
taken the value of the laptop as a unit and it has given the deduction for the
value of the software.
is no error in the computation, particularly, when the respondent has refused
to give the value of the software to the adjudicating authority despite being
called upon to do so.
For the afore-stated reasons, we are of the view that the imported laptops were
classifiable under CTH 84.71 whereas operating software recorded on HDD imported
as packaged software were classifiable under CTH 85.24 and accordingly Civil
Appeal filed by the Department deserves to be allowed, and the impugned
judgment of the Tribunal is set aside. There will be no order as to costs.
Pages: 1 2