& Ors Vs. State of Rajasthan  Insc 183 (5 April 2002)
Shah & B.N. Agrawal B.N.Agrawal, J.
impugned in this appeal has been rendered by Jodhpur Bench of the Rajasthan
High Court whereby criminal appeal preferred by the appellants has been
dismissed confirming the convictions and sentences awarded against the
appellants by the trial court under Sections 326 and 325 read with section 34
of the Indian Penal Code.
said criminal appeal was filed in the year 1987 and duly admitted. The same was
placed for hearing in the year 2001 and after hearing the parties, the High
Court passed an order in four pages. The impugned judgment, runs into seven
paragraphs and after referring to the prosecution case and defence version in paras
1 to 5, the Court has disposed of the appeal in two paragraphs which run thus:-
"6. After re-appreciation of the evidence and re-scrutiny of the record, I
find that there is no error apparent in the finding recorded by the learned Judge,
therefore, there is no reason to interfere in the order of conviction passed by
the learned Judge.
the result, therefore, the present appeal is dismissed." The impugned
judgment has been challenged on the sole ground that the High Court has not
disposed of the appeal in the manner postulated under law inasmuch as it does
not appear from the impugned judgment as to how many witnesses were examined on
behalf of the prosecution and on what point. The High Court has not even
referred to any evidence much less considered the same. In our view, it is a
novel method of disposal of criminal appeal against conviction by simply saying
that after re-appreciation of the evidence and re-scrutiny of the records, the
Court did not find any error apparent in the finding of the trial court even
without reappraising the evidence. In our view, the procedure adopted by the
High Court is unknown to law. It is well settled that in a criminal appeal, a
duty is enjoined upon the appellate court to reappraise the evidence itself and
it cannot proceed to dispose of the appeal upon appraisal of evidence by the
trial court alone especially when the appeal has been already admitted and
placed for final hearing. Upholding such a procedure would amount to negation
of valuable right of appeal of an accused which cannot be permitted under law.
Thus, we are of the view that on this ground alone, the impugned order is fit
to be set aside and the matter remitted to the High Court.
the appeal is allowed, impugned order passed by the High Court is set aside and
the matter is remitted to that Court for disposal of the appeal in accordance
with law after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties.
M.B.SHAH ] ....J.