Vs. J. Venkatarama Naidu  INSC 1105 (10 September 1996)
K. Ramaswamy, K. Faizan Uddin (J) G.B. Pattanaik (J)
O R D
have heard learned counsel on both sides.
appeal by special leave arises from the order of the High Court of Andhra
Pradesh made on July 9,
1996 in CRP
No.4290/95. The matter arises under Section 10(2) (1) of the A.P. Buildings
(Lease, Rent. and Eviction) Control Act, 1960. The principal ground for
eviction ordered by all the three courts below is that the appellant has
committed willful default in the payment of the rent from the month of June
1990 till October 31,
contention of Shri Subba Rao, learned counsel for the appellant, is that the
respondent landlord was staying in Hyderabad and the power of attorney holder is his brother-in-law-cum-maternal
uncle and that whenever he was coming to Madanpalle, he was paying the rents
and, therefore, there is a contract to the contrary. We find no substance in
the contention. Though parties are related, nonetheless when the appellant is
staying in the premises as tenant, he has got an obligation to pay the rent
does not do so, he commits willful default. If he finds that the landlord is
evading the payment of rent, procedure has been prescribed under Section 8 of
the Act to issue notice to the landlord to name the bank and if he does not
name the bank, the tenant has to file an application before the Rent Controller
for permission to deposit the rents The appellant did not avail of that remedy.
The omission to avail of the procedure under Section 11 does not disentitle the
landlord to seek eviction for willful default.
appeal is accordingly dismissed. However, three months time from today is
granted to the appellant to vacate the premises on his giving an usual
undertaking within four weeks from today. No costs.
Pages: 1 2