Maganlal Thakker Vs. Pranjivandas Maganlal Thakker & Ors  INSC 1103 (10 September 1996)
Faizan Uddin, G.B. Pattanaik
O R D
appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the Division Bench of the
Gujarat High Court made in FA No. 421/74 on September 13, 1979. The admitted facts are that one Motilal Gopalji was the
owner of the properties bearing Revenue Survey No. 172/8 situated in Pratapnagar
area of the city of Baroda. The property consists of 15 rooms
of the chawl and an open land surrounding the same.
appellant is the sister of the first respondent. Motilal Gopalji had executed
gift deed, Ex.111 dated May
15, 1965 in favour of
the respondent. Thereafter, he had executed another deed, Ex. 198 dated June 9, 1965, cancelling the said gift. He
executed a will in favour of the appellant and another brother of the appellant
on May 17, 1966. Motilal Gopalji died two days
thereafter, i.e., May 19, 1966.
the respondent laid a suit in the Court of the Civil Judge, Senior Division in Baroda for declaration of his title to the
properties and injunction restraining the appellant and her brother from
collecting the rents. The trail court decreed the suit. On appeal, it was
this appeal by special leave.
R.P. Bhatt, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant, contended that
a reading of the recitals of the gift deed and the cancellation deed do clearly
indicate the intention of the donor and the donee, namely, the gift was not
complete. It was a conditional one. He reserved life interest in the property
and had not handed over the possession of the property; nor had the donee
accepted the gift, thereby, the gift was incomplete. The gift which was duly
cancelled became inoperative during the life time of the donor. The donor had
cancelled it within one month of the gift. Subsequently, he had executed a will
in favour of the appellant and her brother. Thereby, the courts below were
wrong in construing that the gift became operative and by operation of gift
deed dated May 15, 1965 the donor Motilal Gopalji was
devoid of power to cancel the gift deed.
contended by Shri Dholakia, learned senior counsel for the respondent, that the
view taken by the High Court is correct in law. It is stated that Motilal Gopalji
had delivered symbolic possession to the respondent. What he preserved was only
right to collect rent for his maintenance and thereafter he had no power to
cancel it. The recitals in the cancellation deed are not material. Only the
recitals in the gift deed have to be considered. On their own face value they
do indicate that Motilal Gopalji had divested himself totally of the right,
title and interest in the property, the subject matter of the gift over. Consequently,
he had no power to cancel the gift and the will executed by Motilal Gopalji was
inoperative. We find no force ib the contention for the respondent.
now well settled legal position that a documents has to be read harmoniously as
a whole giving effect to all the clauses contained in the document which
manifest the intention of the persons who execute the document. The material
part of the gift deed reads as under:
said immovable property as described above with the ground floor and with ways
to pass and with the water disposal and with all other concerned rights, titles
is gifted to you and the possession whereof is handed over to you under the
following conditions to be observed by you and your heirs and legal
representatives as long as the Sun and the Moon shine.
now I or my heirs or legal representatives have no right on the said property.
You and your heirs and your heirs and legal representatives have become the
exclusive owners of the same. You and your heirs and legal representatives are
entitled to enjoy, to transfer or to use the said property as you like under
the conditions mentioned in this deed.
myself, there is nobody`s right, title, interest or share on the said property:
I have not mortgaged the same by any document.
however anybody comes forward to claim the fight, I shall remove the same.
said property is gifted to you on such conditions that and you are made owners
by the gift deed of the said property on such conditions that there are 15
rooms on the said property at present. I am rightful to receive the rents and
the mesne profit whatsoever accused from the said rooms throughout my life. I
am only entitled to receive the mesne profit of the said, property till I live.
Therefore, I the executant, shall be entitled to let out the said buildings
(rooms), to receive the rent amount to make all the other arrangement
throughout my life. Similarly the said property shall be in my possession till
I live. Therefore, I have gifted this property to you by reserving permanently
my rights to collect the mesne profit of the existing rooms throughout my life.
And by this gift deed the limited ownership right will be conferred to you till
I live. After my death you are entitled to transfer the said property. I shall
not give in any way my right to anybody to collect the mesne profit. You may
get transferred the said property in your name in support of this deed. This
gift deed is executed to you under the aforesaid conditions." The material
part of the cancellation deed reads as under:- "I have, on 15-5-65, executed a conditional gift deed of Rs.9,000/- in
words Rupees nine thousand in favour of you. The said deed has been presented
in the office of the Sub Registrar, Baroda at Serial no. 2153 of the book no.1
and it registered on 15-5-65. The description of the property mentioned in the
said deed is as under." "I executed to you a conditional gift deed of
the said property from sky to earth. You had promised me to fulfill the oral
conditions between us. But immediately after making the gift accordingly, you
denied to fulfill the conditions.
possession of the gifted property is not handed over to you.
fact you have not accepted the conditional gift of the property and I am also
not willing to act according to the mentioned in the possession shall be kept
with me. And so accordingly my possession is beginning and it is permanent. You
are not ready to act according to our conditions.
I have to execute immediately this deed of cancelling the conditional gift deed
between us. Therefore, I hereby cancel the conditional gift deed dated 15-5-
665 of Rs.9,000/- in words rupees nine thousand presented at the serial no.
2153 on 15-5-65 in the office of the Sub- Registrar Baroda for registration.
Therefore, the said conditional gift deed dated 15-5-65 is hereby cancelled and
meaningless. The property under the conditional gift has not been and is not to
be transferred in your name. I will be at present and permanently remain in my
name." Section 122 of the Transfer of property Act [for short, the
"TP Act"] defines 'gift' to mean the transfer of certain existing
movable or immovable property made voluntarily and without consideration, by
one person, called the donor, to another, called the donee, and accepted by or
on behalf of the donee.
by or on behalf of the donee must be made during the life time of the donor and
while he is still capable of giving.
would thus be clear that the execution of a registered gift deed, acceptance of
the gift and delivery of the property, together make the gift complete.
Thereafter, the donor is divested of his title and the donee becomes the
absolute owner of the property. The question is: whether the gift in question
had become complete under Section 123 of the TP Act? It is seen from the
recitals of the gift deed that Motilal Gopalji gifted the property to the
other words, It was a conditional gift. There is no recital of acceptance nor
is there any evidence in proof of acceptance. Similarly, he had specifically
stated that the property would remain in his possession till he was alive.
the gifted property would become his property and he was entitled to collect mesne
profits in respect of the existing rooms throughout his life. The gift deed conferred
only limited right upon the respondent-donee. The gift was to become operative
after the death of the donor and he was to be entitled to have the right to
transfer the property absolutely by way of gift or he would be entitled to
collect the mesne profits. It would thus be seen that the donor had executed a
conditional gift deed and retained the possession and enjoyment of the property
during his life time. The recitals in the cancellation deed is consistent with
the recitals in the gift deed. He had expressly stated that the respondent had
cheated him and he had not fulfilled the conditions subject to which there was
an oral understanding between them. Consequently, he mentioned that the
conditional gift given to him was cancelled. He also mentioned that the
possession and enjoyment remained with him during his life time. He stated,
"I have to execute immediately this deed of cancelling the conditional
gift deed between us. Therefore I hereby cancel the conditional gift deed 15-5-65 of Rs.9000/- in words rupees nine thousand presented
at the Serial no. 2153 on 15-5-65 in the
office of the Sub-Registrar Baroda for registration. Therefore, the said
conditional gift deed dated 15-5-65 is
hereby cancelled and meaningless. The property under the conditional gift has
not been and is not to be transferred in your name.: Thus he expressly made it
clear that he did not hand over the possession to the respondent nor did the
gift become complete during the life time of the donor. Thus the gift had
become ineffective and inoperative. It was duly cancelled. The question then
is: whether the appellant would get the right to the property? It is not in
dispute that after the cancellation deed dated June 9, 1965 came to be
executed, duly putting an end to the conditional gift deed dated May 15, 1965,
he executed his last will on May 17, 1965, and died two days thereafter.
appeal is accordingly allowed. The judgements and decrees of the trial Court
and the appellate court stand set aside. Consequently, the suit stands
dismissed. No costs.
Pages: 1 2