President, A.P.M.C. Taluka Darwha, District Yavatmal, Ma Vs. Manikant & Ors
 INSC 1296 (11
O R D
learned counsel on both sides.
under Section 4  of the Land Acquisition act 1894 [for short, the
"Act"] was published initially on January 8, 1970 acquiring an extent of nearly 3
acres and odd of land; part of the same was withdrawn by notification under
Section 48 [I], Subsequently, another notification was issued on September 6, 1993 acquiring a part. of the land which
was withdrawn by notification under Section 48 . Ultimalely, the land
acquired now remains is 3 acres 33 gunthas. The Land, Acquisition Officer
determined the market value @ Re.0.36 per sq. foot. On reference, the Civil
Judge enhanced the market value to Re.1/- per sq. foot. The appellants have not
carried the matter in appeal to the High Court against the market value
enhanced by the reference Court. On further appeal by the claimants, the High
Court enhanced the compensation to Rs.1.30 per sq. foot for the land covered
under the second notification by impugned judgment dated July 30/31, 1992 made
in Appeal No.241/88, Thus this appeal by special leave.
Land Acquisition Officer in his award has described the typography and
potentiality of the land thus:
land under acquisition falls within the municipal limit of Digras. Digras is a
pressures [sic] and commercial town. Previously it was a renowned cotton
market. This land falls on Digras-Manora District Major road. It is also
adjoining to Darwha-Pusad road, The market yard, godown and offices of A.P.M.C.
Digras, are just adjoining to the Abadi of the town. A anew locality of Shastry
Nagar is on the Western side of this land. Now constructions of the buildings
are in progress in the vicinity of this land. This is a plan and table land.
The Ginning Factory of Digras cooperative Society is also adjoining to this
land. The existing cotton market is just adjoining to this land. The shade of
the Grain market is also adjoining to this land. The construction of
residential houses of D.Y.K. S. Cooperative Society are also constructed on
eastern side of this land. Since the plot No.sheet no. is given in Nazul record
to this land it was already converted into non Agricultural purposes. So this
land had non- agricultural potentiality in view of the above description."
That was affirmed by the reference Court. The claimants relied upon the sale
deeds, Exs. 43,40 and 61. Ex. 43, sale deed executed on January 8, 1970 relates to 4 acres of land sold at
the rate of Rs. 4000/- per acre. It was on the same date of publication of the
notification. Ex.40 relates to sale transaction of 1 acre of land dated
December 6, 1970, one year thereafter sold for Rs.15,000/-. Ex. 61 is dated
August 27, 1971 under which 3 acres gunthas of land was sold for Rs.61,501/-
which worked out to the rate of Rs.16,000/- and odd per acre. Therefore, the
courts below wee not justified in enhancing the compensation @ Re.1/- Per sq. foot
and Rs.1,30 and Rs.1.70 sq, foot as determined therein.
now well settled legal position that when a large extent of land was acquired
for established of market yard, no willing purchaser would be prepared to
purchase the land on square Foot basis. Therefore, the very principle on which
the courts below had proceeded to determine the compensation is vitiated by
obvious error of law. However, the appellants did not challenge the award of
the reference Court which had become final as against them. Therefore, any
inference even by this Court would not be beyond what was determined by the
reference Court though done wrongly on the square foot basis. The High Court,
therefore, was in error in enhancing the compensation to Rs,1.30 per square
foot in relation to the First notification and Rs.1,70 per square foot in
relation to the second notification.
appeal is accordingly allowed and the judgment and decree of the High Court
stand set aside and that of the reference Court stands restored as having
Pages: 1 2