State
of U.P. & Anr Vs. Ved Pal Singh & Anr
[1996] INSC 1260 (7 October 1996)
K. Ramaswamy,
G.B. Pattanaik
ACT:
HEAD NOTE:
O R D
E R
Leave
granted.
We
have heard learned counsel on both sides.
This
appeal by special leave arises against the judgment of the High Court of
Allahabad dated 12.8.92 made in W.P. No.507/83. It is not necessary to re-count
all the events touching upon the interference by the High Court in the matter.
We issued notice only on the limited questior of payment of back wages. The respondent
who was on temporary service was removed from service on conviction by criminal
court. A criminal case had been initiated against him for offence under section
409 I.P.C. No doubts, later, he was acquitted of the charge. The record of the
service of the respondent was produced before the Tribunal. The Tribunal on
going through the record was not inclined to interfere with the order. But the
High Court had interfered with the removal of the respondent from service,
Since we are not going into the question of correctness of the removal of the
respondent from service after acquittal, it would suffice to state that from
the record placed before us, we are satisfied that the respondent is not
entitled to the back wages. His integrity was doubted and he was found to be
man of doubtful integrity. His confidential reports are not good.
Corruption
is the result of deep-seated moral degradation and unsatiated greed for wealth.
The office of public service affords an opportunity to the public servant to
abuse of the office in that pursuit to accept illegal gratification for the
discharge of official duty. Criminal prosecution launched against the public
servant many a time may end may be due to technical defects inapathy on the
part of the prosecution or approach in consideration of the problem or the witnesses,
turn hostile or other diverse reasons but the meet of the matter is that on
equitable consideration the Government servant claims reinstatement into
service. Equity per se may not prevent the Government to take appropriate
action under the conduct rules or under Article 311 of the Constitution but
many a time they do become fruitless exercise. Resultantly public servant on
re- instatement claims consequential benefits including back wages. On many
occasion, public servant avoids the detection of corruption or by skilful
management proof of commission of corruption would be wanting. But his conduct
gains notoriety in service and among public in that behalf payment of back
wages and impetus and a premium on corruption. The society has to pay the price
for corrupt officers from public exchequer. Therefore, when the court directs
payment of back wages or reinstatement, the court/tribunal is required to
consider the backdrop of the circumstances and pragmatically apply the
principle to the given set of facts. No abstract principle of universal
application Could be laid in that behalf. The confidential reports of the
officer prior to initiation of the prosecution do furnish the evidence of
conduct of the public servant. It is the duty of the officer to place his
material and of the Government to place all the necessary record in that behalf
before the court/tribunal for consideration and it would be for the
court/tribunal to consider and decide the matter. This Court has pointed out in
several cases the need to record confidential reports objectively and
dispassionately with a reformative purpose to enable the public servant to
reform himself to improve quality of the service and efficiency of the
administration. Parochial, sectorial or nepotic approach would be deleterious
to the efficiency of administration and maintenance of discipline in service.
Confidential reports placed on record in this case do disclose such deleterious
tendency in writing the confidential reports. One set of officers reported
integrity of the appellant and while diametrically in opposite terms the
predecessor had reported doubtful integrity of the appellant. They do
demonstrate the lack of objectivity on the part of some officers in writing the
confidential reports. This would be very sad state of affairs impinging upon
efficiency of administration. We have confined to the question of payment of
back wages with an intention that on reinstatement the appellant would reform himself
purging from the proclivity of corrupt practices and prove himself to be a
useful public servant to himself, to the family and to the society. In the
light of the confidential reports indicating doubtful integrity we are of the
view that it is not expedient to direct payment of back wages though he was
acquitted by the criminal court may be on technical grounds or on merits he is
not entitled to back wages. As stated earlier the circumstances of the case and
conduct of the appellant do furnish justification in denying him the back wages
lest it would be a premium on proclivity for corruption.
The
appeal is accordingly allowed. The order directing Payment of back wages stands
set aside. No costs.
Back
Pages: 1 2