Narindra
Kumar Jain Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh [1996] INSC 745 (10 May 1996)
Ramaswamy,
K.Ramaswamy, K.G.B. Pattanaik (J)
CITATION:
JT 1996 (5) 594 1996 SCALE (5)7
ACT:
HEAD NOTE:
O R D
E R
Leave
granted.
This
appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the Division Bench of the
Madhya Pradesh High Court made in Criminal Appeal No.1394 on October 15, 1986. The Magistrate has acquitted the
appellant of the charges under Sections 420 and 409 IPC and other offences but
on appeal the High Court convicted the appellant for an offence under Section
409 IPC and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment till the rising of the Court,
and a fine of Rs.500/-. In default of the payment of the fine, he was directed
to undergo six months' rigorous imprisonment. Since the learned counsel for the
appellant had raised a question whether the deficiency is within 5% of the
total quantity and since the Court had not gone into that question, we directed
the State to produce the entire record. Pursuant thereto, the evidence has been
made part of the record and we have carefully scanned the evidence.
The
charge against the appellant is that he was posted as Manager of Kisan Rice
Mills, Sarngarth between January
29, 1968 to October 30, 1973. During the said period, while he
was in custody and management of the huge stocks of paddy entrusted to him, it
was found that 1,500 quintals paddy was unaccounted for. Consequently, the
charge came to be framed against him in the Court of the Chief Judicial
Magistrate for the aforesaid offences. As stated earlier, the Magistrate
acquitted him of the charges but the High Court convicted him for the offences
under Section 409 IPC. After elaborate consideration of the evidence, the High
Court has recorded as under:
"In
our opinion the evidence discussed above clearly establishes that 1,500 qtls. of
paddy was found short in the stock which was verified in the presence of the
accused. It is true that only 5% of bags were weighed out of the total quantity
present. That, however, has been the matter employed and the accused never
raised any objection to it. In any case, the accused has admitted the shortage
vide Ex.P-13 and his explanation have been that it was due to the fact of the
paddy drying. The documents proved and the oral evidence discloses that he had
made false entries and showed a false transfer of this quantity of paddy to Baramkela
society. In our opinion, the evidence establishes beyond doubt that the accused
had misappropriated 1500 quintals of paddy entrusted to him." This finding
of the High Court gets amply support from the evidence of the witnesses. We are
totally in agreement with the said finding. The witnesses are disinterested
official witnesses. They have no axe to grind against the appellant. PW-1 has
explained that he had physically got the stock verified every year and noted
the deficiency. He also stated that it was done in the presence of the
appellant- accused. PW-2 also has spoken with reference to the record of the
maintenance and he was in custody of the record thereof. Under these
circumstances, the evidence clearly establishes that the appellant has failed
to account for 1,500 quintals of paddy entrusted to him. Therefore, the
conviction of the appellant under Section 409 is well justified. Though we find
that the sentence imposed by the High Court was inadequate but at this distance
of time, it will not be necessary to give any notice for the enhancement of the
sentence.
The
appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Back
Pages: 1 2