State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Hiralal & Ors  INSC
67 (15 January 1996)
K.Ramaswamy, K.G.B. Pattanaik (J)
JT 1996 (1) 669 1996 SCALE (1)SP35
O R D
view of the office report, it would be clear that the respondents obviously
managed to have the notice returned with postal remarks "not available in
the house", "House locked" and "shop closed"
respectively. In that view, it must be deemed that the notices have been served
on the respondents.
controversy raised in this case is covered by an order of this Court dated
August 2, 1995 made in Civil Appeal arising out of SLP (C) No.9048 of 1988. We
have heard the counsel for the appellant and following the judgment passed by
this Court, we held that the respondents are not entitled to the benefit of the
provisions of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as amended by Act 68 of 1984.
they are entitled to solatium at 15% and interest at 6% on the enhanced
compensation from the date of taking possession till date of deposit.
appeal is accordingly allowed but, in the circumstances, without costs.
Pages: 1 2