National Aluminium Co. Ltd. Vs. Raj Kishore @ Sahu Jena & Anr  INSC 33
(9 January 1996)
K.Ramaswamy, K.G.B. Pattanaik (J)
1996 SCC (3) 44 JT 1996 (1) 617 1996 SCALE (1)SP34
O R D
notice was served on the respondents, no one has appeared for the first
respondent-claimant. The controversy is no longer res integra. They are covered
by the judgment of this Court in U.P. Avas Vikas Evam Parishad v. Gyan Devi
[Dead] by Lrs. & Ors. [JT 1994 (7) SC 304]. In that view, the appellant
being beneficiary is entitled to be impleaded as a party in the pending
proceedings in the court of Subordinate Judge, Angul.
appeal is accordingly allowed. No costs.
Pages: 1 2