& Anr Vs. State of U.P. & Ors  INSC 768 (30 November 1995)
K.Ramaswamy, K.Majmudar S.B. (J)
1996 SCC (1) 626 1995 SCALE (6)777
APPEAL NO.3488 OF 1979 Virendra Singh V State of U.P. & Ors.
O R D
the case has been called twice, the appellants are not present in person. We
have taken the assistance of Shri K.S. Chauhan, learned counsel appearing for
controversy raised in this case is covered by the judgment of this Court in Ramesh
Chand v. State of U.P.[(1980) 1 SCR 498] where this Court had held that
"failure to specify number of services would not invalidate the draft
scheme under Section 68 C or the approved scheme under Section 68D of the Motor
Vehicles Act, 1939". Same is the question in these appeals also. Under
these circumstances, the omission to specify the number of services in the
approved scheme does not invalidate the scheme already approved.
appeals are accordingly dismissed but in the circumstances without costs.
Pages: 1 2