Special Land Acquisition Officer. Bangalore Vs. Sri Dyavappa & Ors [1995] INSC 437 (29 August 1995)
Ramaswamy,
K. Ramaswamy, K. Hansaria B.L. (J)
CITATION:
1995 SCC (5) 584 1995 SCALE (5)189
ACT:
HEAD NOTE:
O R D
E R
A
notification under s.4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act (for short, 'the Act')
was published on October
6, 1975 acquiring Ac.
7.14 cents of land near Bangalore for Agriculture University. Pursuant to the notice under ss.9
and 10. the respondents claimed compensation at the rate of Rs. 60,000/- per
acre. The Land Acquisition Collector awarded compensation for the agriculture
land to the extent of Ac.5.20 cents, @ Rs.12,000/- per acre and for Ac. 1.34,
he awarded @ Rs.1,000/- per acre, treating the same as phot- kharab land. On
reference under s.18, the Court relying upon a sale deed, Ext.P6 dated February
24, 1975 to an extent of Ac.1.8 cents sold at Rs.50,000/- per acre which was
purchased for setting up of a factory,awarded Rs.42,500/- per acre. Being
dissatisfied, the appellant preferred appeal before the High Court, who by its
impugned judgment dated September
7, 1979 confirmed the
same, against which these appeals by special leave have been filed.
Two
contentions have been raised by Mr.M.Veerappa, learned counsel for the
appellant. First, it is argued that in view of the fact that the lands under
Ext-P.6 are situated at a distance of 2 to 3 furlongs from the acquired lands,
it would be evident that those lands are not similarly situated and, therefore,
awarding compensation at he rate of Rs.42,500/- per acre relying on Ext.P.6 is
not justified in law. We find no force in the contention. The High Court has
considered the fact that the lands are nearer to the Bangalore-Mysore Road and near about the lands where Coca
Cola factory is established. Finding these circumstances favourable to the
respondents, the High Court confirmed the award at the rate of Rs.42,500/- per
acre.
It was
next contended that the Reference
Court and the High
Court were not justified in awarding compensation at the rate of Rs.42,500/-
for Ac.1.34 cents which is phot- kharab when the agriculture lands also had
been awarded at the rate of Rs.42,500/- per acre. Though prima facie we were
impressed with this argument but, unfortunately, this contention was not raised
in the High Court nor the High Court had advantage of going into this
circumstance. Even the Reference
Court judgment has
not been made part of the record. Therefore, we are unable to know what are the
grounds that weighed with the reference court to award compensation at the rate
of Rs.42,500/- for the phot-kharab land to the extent of Ac.1.34 cents. It is
also to be seen that this point was not raised in the grounds of appeal in this
Court.
In
these circumstances, we are constrained not to agree with the contentions
raised by the appellant. The appeals are accordingly dismissed. No costs.
Back