on Judicial Accountability Vs. Justice V. Ramaswami  INSC 537 (20 October 1994)
M.N.(Cj) Venkatachalliah, M.N.(Cj) Ahmadi, A.M. (J) Kuldip Singh (J)
1995 SCC (1) 5 1994 SCALE (4)634
"Sub-Committee on Judicial Accountability", a group of members of the
legal profession, has brought this petition for suo motu initiation of
proceedings for criminal contempt against the respondent. The matter is stated
to arise out of a letter dated 21-1-1992 which
the respondent wrote to the Enquiry Committee constituted under the Judges
(Inquiry) Act, 1968 in certain proceedings for removal of the respondent
initiated by Parliament. In this letter the respondent is said to have made
certain sweeping allegations against certain Judges and the Judiciary. A copy
of that letter is Annexure 'N to the petition.
have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have sought the assistance of
Shri Dipankar Gupta, learned Solicitor General. We place on record our
appreciation of the valuable assistance rendered by the learned counsel on both
is a Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 2164 of 1992 filed by Shri K.K. Jha, 'Kamal',
Advocate, Patna High Court, for intervention. In our opinion, this application
for intervention is misconceived and is dismissed.
the letter, read by itself, raises certain apprehensions about its propriety,
however, the respondent himself by his subsequent letter dated 28-3-1992, which has since been brought on record, has
explained the context in which it was written and the apprehensions about the
generality of its sweep stand mitigated. However, we feel that a lot of
misunderstanding could have been avoided if the letter Annexure 'A: had not
been written. We are unhappy that it came to be written.
on a careful consideration of the matter we, while expressing our unhappiness
about the episode, however think we should decline in the larger interest to suo
motu institute any proceedings for contempt against the respondent. The
petition is dismissed accordingly.