Nigam & Anr Vs. Nareshwar Sahi Mathur & Anrs  INSC 516 (6 October 1994)
K. Ramaswamy, K. Venkatachala N. (J)
1995 SCC (1) 21 1994 SCALE (4)589
matter relates to promotion to the post of Chief Engineer, Level 11 in U.R Jal Nigam.
The U.R Public Services Tribunal is specially constituted to consider the
service grievances of government servants of the U.P. State.
government servants, Mr Om Narain Dwivedi and Mr S.C. Atri, approached the High
Court of Allahabad at Allahabad Bench for redressal of their service
grievances, two different Benches of the High Court by orders dated 23-3- 1993
and 15-4-1993 directed to avail themselves of the statutory alternative remedy
available from the Tribunal and in case they were unsuccessful in getting the
relief, to approach the High Court. The respondent, who was also a government
servant filed the writ petition in the High Court of Allahabad at Lucknow Bench
seeking relief as regards his service grievance and the High Court entertained
the writ petition and directed the parties to complete their pleadings. The
appellant filed an application to dismiss the writ petition and direct the
respondent to avail himself of the statutory remedy. The Division Bench, by the
impugned order dated 19-1-1994, held that since the pleadings were
complete, it was not necessary to relegate the parties to the Tribunal to avail
themselves of the statutory remedy and that, therefore, dismissed the application.
Thus, this appeal by special leave.
is contended for the respondents by Mr Pramod Swarup, learned counsel for the
respondents that since the pleadings were complete, direction was given by the
learned Chief Justice for early disposal and hence this is not a case
warranting interference under Article 136. We find no force in the contention.
When a statutory Tribunal was constituted specially to look into the grievances
of government servants, it is statutory obligation on the part of such government
servants, first to avail them selves of the statutory remedy.
case, they are aggrieved against the order passed by the Tribunal, the remedy
under Article 226 is always available to them. Under these circumstances, when
the two Division Benches had rightly declined to 23 entertain the writ
petitions and directed the parties to avail themselves of the statutory remedy,
another Division Bench was wholly unjustified in entertaining the writ petition
under the impugned order and directing its early disposal.
appeal is accordingly allowed. The High Court is requested to transmit the
papers to the Tribunal. It is open to the respondents to avail themselves of
the statutory remedy before the Tribunal. No costs.