Union of India Vs. Baleshwar Singh  INSC 8 (10 January 1994)
Special leave granted.
have heard learned counsel for the parties. A preliminary point of jurisdiction
was raised by the learned counsel for the Union of India based on Section 28 of
the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985. He very candidly stated that although
this question was not raised in the High Court since there is inherent lack of
jurisdiction in the High Court, the matter deserves consideration from this
point of view. We have heard the learned counsel for both sides on the said
question and we think there is force in the submission.
Section 28 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 in terms states that on
and from the date from which any jurisdiction, power and authority becomes
exercisable under this Act by a Tribunal in relation to recruitment and matters
concerning recruitment to any service or post or service matters concerning
members of any service or persons appointed to any service or post, no court
the Supreme Court; or
any Industrial Tribunal, Labour Court or other authority constituted under the
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 or any other corresponding law for the time being
in force, shall have, or be entitled to exercise any jurisdiction, powers or
authority in relation to such recruitment or matters concerning such
recruitment or such service matters.
view of this legal position, there can be no doubt that the High Court does not
have jurisdiction in matters of the type referred to in the section. The
learned counsel for the respondent was not in a position to point out how the
High Court could exercise jurisdiction in regard to a service matter. We,
therefore, think that the preliminary contention raised by the learned counsel
for the Union of India must be accepted. We accept the same and set aside the
impugned order of the High Court and dismiss the writ petition, but in the
facts and circumstances of the case we permit the respondent to approach the
Tribunal, if so advised, with a fresh petition within 15 days from today
whereupon the Tribunal will consider the matter on merits without raising the
issue of limitation and without being influenced by the observations of the
High Court in the impugned matter on merits. The appeal will stand allowed
accordingly with no order as to costs.