State of Orissa Vs. Radheyshyam Mehar
[1994] INSC 683 (14 December 1994)
FAIZAN UDDIN (J) FAIZAN UDDIN (J) AGRAWAL,
S.C. (J)
CITATION: 1995 AIR 855 1995 SCC (1) 652 JT
1995 (1) 196 1994 SCALE (5)288
ACT:
HEADNOTE:
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by
FAIZAN UDDIN, J.-
1.
Leave
granted.
2.
The
short question that arises for ourconsideration in this appeal is whether the
impugned order of the High Court of Orissa dated 27-9-1993 passed in OJC No.
5435 of 1993 directing the appellants not to take any decision on the
advertisement dated 27-7-1993 issued by the Superintendent CDMO, Bolangir to
settle the shop with anyone to hold a medical store inside the hospital
premises, Patnagarh could be sustained in the absence of any material to show
that the said decision of the Government is arbitrary or opposed to any rule or
regulations in that behalf. 3. The brief facts leading to this appeal under
Article 136 of the Constitution are that the State Government of Orissa with a
view to streamline the existing procedure for opening of 24 hours medical
stores in the College, Hospitals, etc. and in super session of previous
instructions took a decision that 24 hours medical stores shall be opened in
the campus of the hospital which shall remain open for all the 24 hours with a
view to make the medicines available to the patients at competitive price.
Consequently, a memo dated 13-5-1993 was
issued to all the DMET/DHS/DC and all Superintendents of Medical Colleges of
the State of Orissa as well as to all CDMOs and CMOs in the Capital Hospital,
Bhubaneswar to assess the need for having 24 hours medical stores in the campus
of the respective hospitals and if the need is found to be imperative they
shall make an order to that effect and issue advertisement inviting applications
from eligible persons. According to the instruction, the said applications have
to be sent to the authorities mentioned in the aforesaid memo who in turn have
to forward the same to the Government along with their views/comments for a
final decision at the Government level.
1.
2.
3.
It
was in pursuance of this memo that the Superintendent/CDMO, Bolangir issued an
advertisement inviting applications from the intending shop owners to open a
medical store inside the premises of the Sub-Divisional Hospital, Patnagarh
which shall be kept open day and night for the purposes of helping the patients
In getting medicines without any difficulty. Respondents 1 to 7 who are having
their medical stores across the road in front of the main gate No. 2 of the
Hospital filed the writ petition in the High Court of Orissa challenging the
said advertisement issued by the Superintendent/CDMO on the ground that if a
medical store is opened inside the premises of the Sub-Divisional Hospital
which is a small hospital having a provision for only 30 beds, there will
hardly be any business to sustain them. The respondents also came forward 654
with an offer that Petitioners 1 and 4 to 7 (who are Respondents 1, 4 to 7
herein) whose medical stores are near the gate of the Hospital shall keep their
medical stores open day and night and that they are willing to give an
undertaking to that effect to the Superintendent/CDMO, Bolangir. The said
petition was contested by the appellants herein by stating that the said
advertisement was issued in view of the Government policy to open the medical
shop within the campus of the Hospital in public interest and specially to make
the medicines available to the patients even at odd hours.
4.
It
appears that during the course of arguments in the petition before the High
Court the Superintendent/CDMO, Bolangir was personally present in the Court who
in response to certain questions put by the learned Judges stated that the
whole purpose of the advertisement is to make available medicines to the
patients day and night. However, the High Court allowed the petition of the
respondents and directed that no decision shall be taken on the advertisement
to settle the shop with anyone to hold a medical store inside the premises of
the Sub-Divisional Hospital, Patnagarh if the petitioners (Respondents 1, 4 to
7 herein) give an undertaking to the CDMO, Bolangir within 10 days stating that
each one of them shall keep his shop open day and night and shall make the
medicines available to the patients. The High Court further directed that in
the event of any violation of this condition and if the CDMO comes to know that
the ailing patients of the Sub-Divisional Hospital, Patnagarh are not getting
medicines because of the closure of the shops it would be open to him to re-advertise
the settlement of medical store. The appellants being aggrieved by the said
order have preferred this appeal.
5.
Learned
counsel appearing for the appellants vehemently urged before us that the said
advertisement inviting applications for settling the shop to have a medical
store inside the hospital premises was issued in pursuance of the Government
policy and with the sole object to make the medicines available to the patients
even at odd hours and, therefore, the High Court should not have interfered
with the administrative decision of the Government taken in the public
interest. We find considerable force and much substance in these submissions.
6.
In
the aforesaid background the question arises whether, in the absence of any
rule or regulation to the contrary, can the power of the State be abridged on
the basis of an individual interest of certain trader, even to the extent of
restricting the State's capacity to advance larger public good. It can hardly
be disputed that the consideration of availability of the medicines to the
patients should be the uppermost consideration as compared to the right of a
person to derive income and make profits for his sustenance by running a
medical store for the reason that the medical stores are primarily meant for the
patients and not the patients for the medical stores or those who run the same.
The submission of the respondents that if a medical store is opened within the
campus of the Hospital, the same will jeopardise their interest adversely
affecting their business and that they will not be able to sustain themselves
could not be a valid ground to disallow the appellants to open a 655 shop
within the Hospital campus. Undoubtedly, the opening of a medical store within
the Hospital campus will provide a great facility to the patients who may not
be having any attendant of their own in the Hospital for their assistance at
odd hours in the event of an emergency to go out to purchase the medicines.
There may be patients having an attendant who may not find it convenient or
safe to go out of the campus to purchase the medicines in the night hours.
In these facts and circumstances the
paramount consideration should be the convenience of the patients and
protection of their interest and not the hardship that may be caused to the
medical storekeepers who may be having their shops outside the Hospital campus.
Thus the intention of the appellants to open a medical store within the
Hospital campus is to salvage the difficulties of the patients admitted in the
Hospital and this object of the appellants has direct nexus with the public
interest particularly that of the patients and, therefore, the High Court
should not have interfered with the decision of the State Government to settle
the holding of a medical store in the Hospital premises. However, if the
respondents so choose, they may keep their medical stores also open day and
night.
Consequently the impugned order could not be
sustained.
7.
In
the result the appeal succeeds and is hereby allowed.
The impugned order of the High Court dated
27-9-1993 is set aside and the writ petition filed by the respondents is
dismissed. We, however, make no order as to costs.
Back