National
Federation of Blind Vs. Union Public Service Commission & Ors [1993] INSC
148 (23 March 1993)
Kuldip
Singh (J) Kuldip Singh (J) Kasliwal, N.M. (J)
CITATION:
1993 AIR 1916 1993 SCR (2) 556 1993 SCC (2) 411 JT 1993 (2) 541 1993 SCALE
(2)181
ACT:
Visually
Handicapped-Right to compete for civil services- Writ of mandamus u/Art 32 of
the Constitution-Justification for writing civil service Examination in
Braille-Script or with the help of a scribe-Whether visual handicap hinders
equal efficiency.
Entitlement
to claim promotion to higher posts-And right to claim a particular post in the
hierarchy of promotional posts in respect of which the Government has found
that the visually handicapped persons shall not be suitable.
HEAD NOTE:
The
visually handicapped constitute a significant section of our society. As it is
necessary to encourage their participation in every walk of life. The Central
Ministry of Welfare has been undertaking various measures to utilise their
potentialities. The Governments have launched schemes to educate, train and
provide them with useful employment.
The
Central Government has provided 3% reservation in Group C and D posts for
physically handicapped including blind and partially blind, while demand is
growing for reservations in Group A and B posts.
The
Standing Committee of the Ministry of Welfare undertook identification of jobs
in these categories and submitted its report on October 31, 1986. Para 8 thereof related to the blind. It
took note of reading and writing deficiency and suggested the provision of
allowance. And found that the specified 416 posts in Group A and B are suitable
for blind and partially blind. So, the Ministry of Personnel issued office
memorandum dated November 25, 1986 a accepting the report and took policy
decision regarding identification of jobs for the physically handicapped
persons in Group A and B posts filled to be by direct recruitment in Central
Govern- ment Services and Public Sector Undertakings.
This
court examined the memorandum and found that the Government had taken
cognizance of the identified jobs; that the Government had 557 decided about
the recruitment of handicapped lessons to these posts; that the departments
would supplement the list further; that the Ministries/Departments would inform
the UPSC about preferential treatment to handicapped candidates; that the UPSC
had agreed in principle to give preference; and that the Department of
Personnel and Training would be issuing general instructions for the purpose.
However,
the decisions were not implemented for seven years.
So the
petitioner approached this Court seeking a writ in the nature of mandamus
directing the Union of India and the UPSC to permit the blind candidates to
compete for the IA.S. and Allied Services and to provide them facility of
writing the civil services examination either in Braille Script or with the
help of a scribe.
On
hearing the counsel for the petitioner, himself visually handicapped, this
Court,
HELD:
The
performance of the counsel for the petitioner before us has amply proved the
point that the visually handicapped persons can perform the jobs entrusted to
them with equal efficiency. However the question of giving preference to the
handicapped in the matter of recruitment to the identified posts is a matter
for the Government of India to decide. The Government of India is commended to
decide the question of providing preference/reservation to the handicapped in
Group A and B Posts.
[564
C-D-E] This Court further held that there are number of post which are required
to be filled through the civil services examinations and other competitive
examinations conducted by the Commission, so the observations of the UPSC that
the posts identified as suitable to be held by the physically handicapped
persons, particularly those identified for the blind were not required to be
filled on the basis of competitive examination conducted by the Commission,
appeared to be incorrect. [565 D] Group A and B posts in the category of
Administrative Officers are necessarily to be filled as a result of civil
services examination held by the UPSC. If some of the identified posts in the
Indian Administrative Service and other Allied Services can be filled from
amongst the visually handicapped persons, there was no reason why they should
not be permitted to sit and write the civil services examination. [565 E] 558
ORIGINAL
JURISDICTION: Writ Petition (C) No. 655 of 1991.
(Under
Article 32 of the Constitution of India).
Santosh
Kumar Rungta and R.P. Gupta for the Petitioner. V.C. Mahajan, Ms. Niranjana
Singh and Ms. A. Subhashini for the Respondents.
The
Judgment of he Court was delivered by KULDIP SINGH, J. National Federation of
Blind a representative body of visually handicapped persons in India has filed
this petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ in
the nature of mandamus directing the Union of India and the Union Public
Service Commission to permit the blind candidates to compete for the Indian
Administrative Service and the Allied Services and further to provide them the
facility of writing and civil services examination either in Braille-script or
with the help of a Scribe. Braille is a system of writing for the blind in
which the characters consist of raised dots to be read by the fingers. Further
relief sought in the petition is that Group A and B posts in Government and
public sector undertakings which have already been identified for the visually
handicapped persons be offered to them on preferential basis.
The
visually handicapped constitute a significant section of our society and as
such it is necessary to encourage their participation in every walk of life.
The Ministry of Welfare, Government of India has been undertaking various
measures to utilise the potentialities of the visually handicapped persons. The
Central as well as the State Governments have launched several schemes to
educate, train and provide useful employment to the handicapped. The Central
Government has provided reservations to the extent of 3% vacancies in Group C
and D posts for the physically handicapped including blind and partially blind.
There
has been a growing demand from the visually handicapped persons to provide
reservations for them in Group A and B posts under the Central Government. The
Ministry of Welfare, Government of India has a standing Committee or
identification of jobs in various Mini- stries/Departments and public sector
undertakings for the physically hand- 559 icapped. By an order dated December 30, 1985 the Government of India directed
the Standing Committee to undertake the identification of jobs for the
handicapped in Group A and B Services under the Government and public sector
undertakings.
The
Committee submitted its report which was published on October 31, 1986. Copy of the report has been placed
on the record of this petition. In the introduction to the report given by Mr.
M.C. Narsimhan, Joint Secretary to Government of India and Chairman, Stating
committee on identification of jobs for handicapped, it has been stated as
under:- "A Sub Committee, which was set up to assist the Standing
Committee visited a large number of Public Sector Undertakings and observed
people actually working in a variety of jobs and the working conditions in
which these jobs are performed. The Sub Committee had detailed discussions with
the Chiefs and Senior Officers of the Public Sector Undertakings as also with
officers of the Central Government Departments. A fist of the public sector
undertakings and the list of the officers of the Undertakings with whom the Sub
Committee had discussions is annexed to the report. The Committee after
detailed discussions and on- the-spot study has prepared a comprehensive list
of 416 categories in Group A and B posts in Government Offices and Public
Sector Undertakings, with their jobs descriptions, the physical requirement of
each group of job and matched them with various categories of
disabilities." The Committee devoted special attention to the visually
handicapped. Para 8 of the report which relates to
the blind is as under:- "However, in the case of the blind the position is
somewhat different. Seeing, reading, writing and movement are essential
ingredients of most Government jobs.
Therefore,
a similar approach in respect of blind persons may be difficult. It would not
be possible to generalise that blind person can do most jobs as we have found
for those with locomotor and hearing disabilities. The Committee found 560 that
in higher posts is Government the help of a personal assistant or a
stenographer is generally available. But this facility is.
not
available even in higher posts in public sector undertakings. Wherever this
facility is available a blind person may not find it difficult, in certain
groups of posts, to handle the job. It is also possible, in relation to other
posts where stenographic assistance is not available that some other facilities
can be provided to a blind employee. To compensate 'reading deficiency,
readers' allowance can be provided to blind employees to enable them to engage
a reader.
Similarly,
to compensate for "writing deficiency", the blind employee should be
required to know typing. Adequate knowledge of typing should be prescribed as
an essential qualification for blind employees for public employment. Where
mobility may also be one of the main ingredients of a job it is difficult to
compensate blind employees for this "deficiency. The Committee would also emphasise
that the blind employee should be fully responsible for the duties assigned to
them, despite the provision of reader's allowance and typing skill. The
Committee would also suggest that the maximum reader's allowance should be
limited to Rs.200 p.m. to blind employees recruited to Group A and B post.' The
Committee has identified about 416 categories of Group A and B posts which are
suitable for the handicapped. The Committee has further specified that the
visually handicapped (blind and partially blind) are suitable for appointment
to the following categories of Group A and B post:- No. in the List Category of
Group Annexed to the Post Report
------------------------------------------------------------ 178 to 187 Hindi
officers A & B 191 to 192 Job Analyst A & B 193 to 199 Labour Welfare
Officers A & B 200 to 209 Law Officers A & B 561 237 to 242 Personal
Assistants B 243 to 256 Personnel Officers A & B 279 to 291 Public
Relations Officers A & B 295 to 317 Research Officers A & B 354 to 363
Training Officers A & B 364 to 376 Administrative Officer (Non Secretarial)
A 377 to 384 Administrative Officers (Secretarial-Sr.) A 385 to 401 Administrative
Officers (Secretarial-Junior) A & B 409 Asstt. Admin. Officer We have only
quoted the list of categories from the report to illustrate the point that the
Committee appointed by the Government has in its report identified certain
categories of posts to which the blind and the partially-blind can be
appointed.
Government
of India Through Ministry of Personnel issued office memorandum dated November 25, 1986 wherein it accepted the report of
the Committee and took a policy decision that in respect of the posts
identified by the Committee the handicapped persons shall be given preference
in the matter of recruitment to those posts. The office memorandum is
re-produced hereunder:
"No.F.36034/4/86-Estt.(SCT)
Government of India Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions
Department of Personnel & Training ..............
New
Delhi, the 25th November, 1986 OFFICE MEMORANDUM Subject:-
Identification of jobs for the physically handicapped persons in Groups 'A' and
'B' posts filled by direct recruitment in the Central Government services and
Public Sector Undertakings.
562
The undersigned is directed to say that with a view to effecting optimum utilisation
of potentialities of physically handicapped which constitutes a significant
section of the population in the country, the Ministry of Welfare constituted a
Standing Committee for identification of jobs for the physically handicapped in
the Central Government services and Public Sector Undertakings. The Standing
Committee on identification of jobs set up a sub-Committee for on-the-spot
identification of jobs for the physically handicapped persons in Group 'A and
'B' posts after making an in depth study of Undertakings as well as in
consultation with the concerned authorities.
This
sub Committee in its Report (submitted to the parent Committee) identified 420
jobs in Group 'A' and Group posts/services along with the physical requirements
and functional classifications of disabilities indicating what jobs can be held
by each category of disabled people and with what disability.
It has
been decided that in respect of identified posts which can be held by
physically handicapped persons preferences to physically handicapped persons
will be ,given in the matter of recruitment to those posts.
A copy
of the report of the Committee referred to in para-1 is enclosed for
information guidance and necessary action. The list of jobs identified by the
Committee on suitable for being held by physically handicapped persons is not
exhaustive. The Ministries/Departments can further supplement the list based on
their knowledge for jobs requirements, essential qualifications etc.
The
Ministries/Departments after identifying all the posts which can be held by
physically handicapped persons may inform the UPSC at the time of sending their
requisitions for filling vacancies in respect of those posts, that preference
is to be given to physically handicapped persons in the matter of recruitment.
The UPSC have agreed in principle to give preference to physically handicapped
persons in filling the identified posts. The Depart- 563 ment of Personnel and
Training will be issuing general instructions to enable preference being given
to the physically handicapped persons in such cases.
The
Ministry of Finance etc. are requested to bring these instructions to the
notice of all concerned.
Sd/-
(BATA K, DEY) DIRECTOR (JCA)' From the office memorandum quoted above it is
obvious that the Government of India has taken the following policy decisions
to implement the Committee report:-
1. The
Government of India has taken cognizance of the fact
that the Standing Committee on identification of jobs through its Sub-Committee
has identified 420 jobs in Group A and Group B posts/services along with the
physical requirements and functional Classifications of disabilities indicating
what jobs can be held by each category of disabled people and with what
disability.
2. The
decision has been taken that in respect of identified posts which can be held
by physically handicapped persons preference to physically handicapped persons
will be given in the matter of recruitment to those posts.
3. The
list of jobs identified by the Committee is not exhaustive, the
Ministries/Departments can further supplement the list based on their knowledge
of job requirements, essential qualifications etc.
4. The
Ministries/Departments after identifying all the posts which can be held by
physically handicapped persons may inform the Union Public Service Commission
at the time of sending their requisitions for filling vacancies in respect of
those posts, that preference is to be given to physically handicapped persons
in the matter of recruitment.
5. The
Union Public Service Commission has agreed in principle to give preference to
physically handicapped persons in filling identified posts.
564
6. The
Department of Personnel and Training will be issuing general instructions to
enable preference being given to the physically handicapped persons in such
cases.
Mr.
S.K Rungta, learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the
memorandum dated November
25, 1986 was issued
more than seven years back but so far the decisions taken therein have not been
implemented. Mr. Rungta (himself visually handicapped) has argued his case with
utmost clarity. Mr. Rungta was fully conversant with all the relevant annexures
to the petition. He referred to the relevant pages in the bulky paper book with
perfect ease.
We did
not feel even for a moment that the case was being argued by a visually
handicapped lawyer. Mr. Rungta's performance before us amply. proves the point
that the visually handicapped persons can perform the jobs entrusted to them
with equal efficiency.
The
question of giving preference to the handicapped in the matter of recruitment
to the identified posts is a matter for the Government of India to decide. The
matter is pending for decision with the Government of India for the last
several years. While appreciating various measures undertaken by the Government
to provide useful employment to the handicapped persons we commend the
Government of India to decide the question of providing preference/reservation
to the handicapped in Group A and B posts as expeditiously as possible.
So far
as the claim of visually handicapped for writing the civil services
examinations, in Braille-script or with the help of Scribe, is concerned, we
are of the view that their demand is legally justified.
The
fist of category A and B posts, identified as suitable for the visually
handicapped by the Committee, includes number of posts which are filled as a
result of the civil services examinations. When there are posts to which blind
and partially-blind can be appointed, we see no ground to deprive them of their
right to compete for those posts along with other candidates belonging to
general category.
Mr.
V.K. Cherian, Under Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of Personnel in
his affidavit dated March 10, 1992 filed before this Court has stated as
under:- 565 "If there were Group 'A' and 'B' jobs, which could be filled
up by the blind, the same should also be identified. Once the jobs were
identified, they could be filled up from among the blind and also other
handicapped persons such as deaf and orthopaedically handicapped...... Going by
the Report of the Committee and the posts identified by it, the Union Public
Service Commission made the observation that the posts identified as suitable
to be held by the physically handicapped persons, particularly those iden- tified
for the blind are not such which are required to be filled on the basis of
competitive examination conducted by the Commission'.
The
observations of the Union Public Service Commission as projected by Mr. V.K. Cherian
in his above quoted affidavit do not seem to be correct. After going through
the list of the posts identified as suitable for visually handicapped (blind
and partially-blind) it is obvious that there are number of posts which are
required to be filled through the civil services examination and other
competitive examinations conducted by the Commission. Group A and B posts in
the category of Administrative Officers (Secretarial-Senior) and Administrative
Officer (Secretarial-Junior) are necessarily to be filled as a result of civil
services examination by the Union Public Service Commission. If some of the posts
in the Indian Administrative Service and other Allied Services, as identified
by the Committee, can be filled from amongst the visually handicapped persons
then we see no reason why they should not be permitted to sit and write the
civil services examination. We make it clear that once recruited to the lowest
level of the service the visually handicapped persons shall not be entitled to
claim promotion to the higher posts in the service irrespective of the physical
requirements of the jobs. If in the hierarchy of promotional-posts it is found
by the Government that a particular post is not suitable for the visually
handicapped person he shall not have any right to claim the said post.
In the
light of the above discussion we partly allow the writ petition and direct the
Government of India and the Union Public Service Commission to permit the
visually handicapped (blind and partially-blind) eligible candidates to compete
and write the civil services examination which is ordinarily held yearly by the
Union Public Service Commission.
566 We
further direct that they shall be permitted to write the examination in
Braille-script or with the help of a Scribe.
There
shall be no orders as to costs.
S.P.S.
Petition allowed partly.
Back