Dr.
V.L. Chandra & Ors Vs. All India Institute of Medical Sciences & Ors
[1990] INSC 105 (22
March 1990)
Misra
Rangnath Misra Rangnath Punchhi, M.M. Ramaswamy, K.
CITATION:
1990 SCR (2) 104 1990 SCC (3) 38 JT 1990 (1) 515 1990 SCALE (1)534
ACT:
All
India Institute of Medical Sciences Act, 1956:
Sections
13 and 14---A. 1. 1. M.S. --Research Projects--Researchers-- Termination of
services on comple- tion of Project--Scheme to be evolved to build up team of
Researchers to meet general requirements of research--Con- tinuous Research
Projects to be sponsored--Employment to be provided to the
Researchers--Directions issued.
Constitution
of India, 1950: Article 32--Researchers
employed by A.I.I.M.S.--Completion of project--Services terminated--Researchers
to be provided employment--Direction issued.
HEAD NOTE:
The
Petitioners were employed by the respondent--Insti- tute for carrying out
assignments of research projects undertaken by the Institute. The employment of
three of the four petitioners was terminated. The petitioners filed Writ
Petitions in this Court alleging that they were continuously employed for more
than 10-15 years and had reached an age in life where they were no more
entitled to enter into Govern- ment service or any other suitable employment
and, with the deprivation of their employment they were deprived of the source
of sustenance and the nation of their useful service, as they had picked up
requisite expertise which would be useful in carrying out any normal research
project.
In the
common affidavit filed on behalf of the respond- ents, the respondent-Institute
stated that the employment was project-wise,.and once the project was complete,
the job came to an end, and the services of the petitioners were no longer
required in the absence of any research project, and that the fortuitous
circumstances of continuous engagement did not confer any right on the
petitioners to be in contin- ued employment even when no research project was
in hand.
Disposing
of the petitions, this Court,
HELD:
The All India Institute of Medical Sciences set up by 105 statute is intended
to carry on research in a continuous way to improve the level of medical
knowledge. The Institute is entrusted from time to time with research projects
by the World Health Organisation, the Indian Council of Medical Research and
other government and semigovernment bodies.
Therefore,
a scheme should be evolved by the Institute in coordination with the Health
Ministry and the Indian Council of Medical Research so that a team of researchers
is built up to meet the general requirements of research. Certain projects
would quite possibly require specialised hands and on such occasions a special
team could be set up on casual basis by drawing the competent hands from
different institu- tions for a period but to keep up the tempo of research if a
team of researchers is built up, it would be convenient for the Institute for
purposes of discipline and control as also for efficiency. [108B-C] The Health
Ministry must also sponsor continuous re- search projects in the field of
medicine and health and for such purpose several projects should be listed out
from time to time and entrusted to the respondent-Institute as also a similar
Institute at Chandigarh and to Institutes as and when set
up elsewhere. This would assist in updating rele- vant medial information and
knowledge, apart from building up a scientific tone and temper for general
circulation.
[108D-E]
The Institute should initiate seriously action in this regard without delay and
the Ministry of Health and Indian Council of Medical Research should
collaborate with the Institute. [108E] Since the respondent-Institute has
immediately no scope to employ the petitioners, excepting the one already re- tained,
the remaining three petitioners should be provided employment either as
Researchers or in any suitable alterna- tive employment until their inclusion
in a team of research- ers is considered. The Indian Council of Medical
Research should take appropriate steps to offer adequate employment to the
three petitioners within two months hence. If neces- sary, the Ministry of
Health should cooperate and place adequate funds at the disposal of the Indian
Council of Medical Research. [108F-H]
ORIGINAL
JURISDICTION: Writ Petition Civil Nos. 999 of 1988 and 1043 of 1989.
(Under
Article 32 of the Constitution of India).
R.K.
Jain, Rakesh K. Khanna, Ms. Sangeeta Mandal, Surya Kant and R.P. Singh, (NP)
for the Petitioners.
106 S.
Hegde, Additional Solicitor General, Ms. A. Subha- shini, Ms. Uma Jain and R.K.
Mehta for the Respondents.
The
Judgment of the Court was delivered by RANGANATH MISRA, J. Both these are
applications under Art. 32 of the Constitution, the first one by three peti- tioners
and the second by one. The respondent All India Institute of Medical Sciences
has been set up under a Cen- tral Act of that name of 1956. Section 13 of the
Act pro- vides the objects of the Institute which are:
"(a)
to develop patterns of teaching in udergraduate and post-graduate medical
education in all its branches so as to demonstrate a high standard of medical
education to all medical colleges and other allied institutions in India; (b)
to bring together in one place educational facilities of the highest order for
the training of personnel in all important branches of health activity; and (c)
to attain self-suffi- ciency in post-graduate medical education." Section
14 of the Act lays down the functions of the Institute and, inter alia provides
in cls. (a) and (b):
"14.
With a view to the promotion of the objects specified under section 13, the
Institute may-- (a) provide for undergraduate and post-graduate teaching in the
science of modern medicine and other allied sciences including physical and
biological sciences;
(b) provide
facilities for research in the various branches of such sciences";
Petitioners
have alleged that ever since its inception the Institute has taken up various
research projects and has made valuable contribution to the updating of medical
knowl- edge and building up coordinated research activity. For the purposes of
carrying out such research programme in conjunc- tion with the world Health Organisation,
the Indian Council of Medical Research and other celebrated organisations--both
national and international--research projects are undertaken by the Institute
by employing researchers. For the carrying out of the assignments of research
projects the petitioners were employed more than a decade ago and their
assertion to the effect that 107 they have continuously worked for more than
10-15 years has not been disputed. Petitioners have also asserted that they
have worked to the satisfaction of the authorities and the guides and there is
no denial of that fact too. It is the case of the petitioners that by working
for such a long period continuously and in different projects under differ- ent
guides, they have picked up the requisite expertise which would be useful in
carrying out any normal research project. Petitioners allege that there is work
in the hands of the Institute but petitioners' employment excepting in the case
of Dr. Jasbir Kaur Dhawan (Kochhar), petitioner no.
3 in
the first writ petition, as Researchers have now been terminated. They contend
that having worked for a long period in the Institute they have reached an age
in life where they are no more entitled to enter into Government service or any
other suitable public employment. While they have gathered the requisite
expertise and are useful for the purpose of assisting research programme with
the deprivation of their employment and faced with the ban of over age for any
public employment they are deprived of the source of sustenance and the nation
is deprived of their useful serv- ice.
The
Institute, the Union of India in the Ministry of Health and the Indian Council
of Medical Research have responded to the notice on the petition. A common
affidavit has been filed purporting to be on behalf of the respondents by the
Director of the Institute. It has been stated therein that the Institute is
assigned projects and the Project Guides pick up Researchers depending upon
suitability. The employment is project-wise and once the project is complete,
the job comes to an end. The fact that there has been con- tinuous engagement
available to the petitioners does not change the nature of employment and the
fortuitous circum- stance of continuity does not confer any right in the peti- tioners
to be continued in employment even when the Insti- tute does not have any
research project in hand. It has been specifically pleaded that the services of
the petitioners are not required any longer in the absence of any research
project with the Institute where their services would be suitable.
The
other two respondents being the Union of India and the Indian Council of
Medical Research have not filed any counter affidavit of their own. The
Institute and the Union of India appeared through separate Advocates at the
time of hearing.
Mr. Hegde,
learned Additional Solicitor General indicat- ed his sympathy to the cause of
the petitioners and took an adjournment from the Court to explore the
possibility of offering a solution to the 108 problem and returned to tell us
that though there was a human problem, no solution could be worked out.
The
Institute set up by statute is intended to carry on research in a continuous
way to improve the level of medical knowledge. Under the Act the Institute is
an autonomous body though the Chairman thereof is no other than the Union
Minister of Health. It is true that the Institute is en- trusted from time to
time with research projects by the World Health Organisation, the Indian
Council of Medical Research and other government and semi-government bodies. It
is appropriate that a scheme should be evolved by the Insti- tute in
coordination with the Health Ministry and the Indian 2Council of Medical
Research so that a team of researchers is built up to meet the general
requirements of research. It is quite possible that certain projects would
require spe- cialised hands and on such occasions a special team could be set
up on casual basis by drawing the competent hands from different institutions
for a period but to keep up the tempo of research if a team of researchers is
built up, it would be convenient for the Institute for purposes of discipline
and control as also for efficiency. The Health Ministry must also sponsor
continuous research projects in the field of medicine and health and for such
purpose several projects should be listed out from time to time and entrusted
to the respondent Institute as also a similar Institute at Chandi- garh and to
institutes as and when set up elsewhere. This would assist in updating relevant
medical information and knowledge, apart from building up a scientific tone and
temper for general circulation. We commend that the Insti- tute initiates
seriously action in this regard without delay and we suggest that the Ministry
of Health and the Indian Council of Medical Research collaborate with the
Institute to work out the same.
Respondent
no.3--Indian Council of Medical Research has not chosen to appear separately
before us inspite of service of notice. Since we have been told that the
respondent- Institute has immediately no scope to employ the petitioners
excepting the one that we have named above, we direct that the remaining three
petitioners in these two petitions should be provided employment either as
Researchers or in any suitable alternative employment until their inclusion in
a team of researchers is considered. The Indian Council of Medical Research
shall take appropriate steps to offer adequate employment to the three
petitioners within two months hence. If the question of funding becomes
necessary, we direct the Ministry of Health to cooperate and place adequate
funds at the disposal of the Indian Council of Medical Research.
109 These
two petitions are disposed of with the aforesaid directions and without any
order for costs, with liberty to the petitioners to apply, with the fond hope
that all con- cerned will appreciate the spirit of the order and implement the
direction in the proper way as stipulated.
N.P.V.
Petitions disposed of.
Back