Follow @SCJudgments
Login :
Advocate
|
Client
Supreme Court Judgments
Subscribe
JAN TO JUNE
JULY TO DEC
Sub Menu contents
OCTOBER 1985
1.
H. Anraj Vs. Government of Tamilnadu [1985] INSC 221 (4 October 1985)
2.
Smt. Asha Keshavrao Bhosale Vs. Union of India & ANR [1985] INSC 222 (4 October 1985)
3.
Express Newspapers Pvt. Ltd. & Ors Vs. Union of India & Ors [1985] INSC 223 (7 October 1985)
4.
Shree Sajjan Mills Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, M.P. Bhopal & ANR [1985] INSC 224 (8 October 1985)
5.
Osmania University Vs. Regional Director, Employees State Insurance Corporation, A [1985] INSC 225 (8 October 1985)
6.
Andhra University Vs. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner of Andhra Pradesh [1985] INSC 226 (8 October 1985)
7.
Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Punjab, J & K, Chandigarh, Pati Vs. Yuvraj Amrinder Singh [1985] INSC 227 (8 October 1985)
8.
Kirpal Singh, M.L.A. Vs. Uttam Singh & ANR [1985] INSC 228 (9 October 1985)
9.
Savitri W/O Shri Govind Singh Rawat Vs. Shri Govind Singh Rawat [1985] INSC 229 (9 October 1985)
10.
Harbans Lal Vs. Jagmohan Saran [1985] INSC 230 (10 October 1985)
11.
Commissioner of Income Tax West Bengal, Calcutta Vs. Associated Electrical Industries (India) Private Limited [1985] INSC 231 (10 October 1985)
12.
The Regional Director, Employees' State Insurance Corporation Vs. Bata Shoe Company (P) Ltd. [1985] INSC 232 (11 October 1985)
13.
Gollaleshwar Dev & Ors Vs. Gangawwa Kom Shantayya Math & Ors [1985] INSC 233 (15 October 1985)
14.
Adarsh Travels Bus Service & ANR Vs. State of U.P. & Ors [1985] INSC 234 (17 October 1985)
15.
State Bank of India Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Ernakulam [1985] INSC 235 (31 October 1985)
16.
Divisional Forest Officer & ANR Vs. G.V. Sudhakar Rao & Ors [1985] INSC 236 (31 October 1985)
Tweet
Client Area
|
Advocate Area
|
Blogs
|
About Us
|
User Agreement
|
Privacy Policy
|
Advertise
|
Media Coverage
|
Contact Us
|
Site Map
Powered by Neosys Inc
Information provided on advocatekhoj.com is solely available at your request for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement