Life Insurance Corporation of India, Vs.
Escorts Ltd. & Ors  INSC 95 (30 April 1984)
FAZALALI, SYED MURTAZA FAZALALI, SYED MURTAZA
SEN, AMARENDRA NATH (J) ERADI, V. BALAKRISHNA (J)
CITATION: 1984 SCR (3) 643 1984 SCALE (1)821
Companies Act 1956 ss. 166 and 284 Annual
general meeting holding of notice seeking removal of directors of company-High
Court granting stay injunction in writ petition-interference by Supreme Court.
The appellants in their appeals to this Court
challenged the order of a Single Judge of the High Court admitting the writ
petition of the first respondent company and staying of the notice seeking
removal of certain Directors of the company.
HELD: 1. There will be an order vacating the
order of stay/injunction passed by the Single judge of the High Court,
prohibiting any action being taken on the basis of the requisition put in by
2. All appropriate proceedings will be taken
in accordance with law on the basis of the requisition.
However, no effect should be given to any
resolution the company may pass at the extra-ordinary general meeting to be
held in consequence of the requisition without obtaining prior directing from
this Court. [644F-G]
3. The pendency of these cases in this Court
will not stand in the way of holding the annual general meeting of the company
in the normal course. [644G]
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal
No. 2317 of 1984.
From the Judgment and Order dated
14/15.3.1984 of the High Court of Bombay in W.P. No. 3063/1983.
And Civil Appeal No. 2318 of 1984.
From the Judgment and order dated
14/15.3.1983 of the Bombay High Court in W.P. No. 3063/1983.
644 With Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 190 of
For the Petitioner/Appellant:
K. Parasan, Attorney General, Milan K.
Solicitor General, S.A. Shroff, Miss A
Subhashini and Dr. V. Gori Shanker, For the Respondents:
N. A. Palkhivala, Soli J. Sorabjee, P. R.
Mridul, A. B. Divan, Dr. L.M. Singhvi, K K. Venugopal, J.B. Dadachanji,
Rajinder Narain, Harish Salve, B.S. Bantia, K.S. Cooper, Bedabratta Barua, R.
Nariman, T.M. Ansari, P.K. Ram, Mrs. A.K. Verma and D.N. Mishra.
The Order of the Court was delivered by FAZAL
In SLP (C) Nos. 5392/84 & 5412/84.
We have heard learned Attorney General for
the petitioners and Mr. Palkhivala, learned counsel for respondents at length.
Special leave granted. There will be an order
vacating the order of stay/injunction passed by the Single Judge of the High
Court, prohibiting any action being taken on the basis of the requisition put
in by L.I.C. We direct that all appropriate proceedings will be taken in
accordance with law on the basis of the requisition. However, no effect should
be given to any resolution the company may pass at the extra-ordinary general
meeting to be held in consequence of the requisition without obtaining prior
directions from this Court. The Pendency of these cases in this Court will not
stand in the way of holding the annual general meeting of the company in the
normal course. These appeals are disposed of except that they will be kept
pending for the limited purpose to enable counsel to move this Court for
directions as indicated above. In computing the time for taking steps pursuant
to the requisition, the period from the date of requisition till this day will
be excluded in view of interim stay/injunction granted by the High Court.
The prayer for amendment of the cause title
645 Transfer Petition (C) No. 190 of 1984.
Mr. Palkhivala, learned counsel on behalf of
the respondents states that matter is being listed before the High Court for
final hearing on 11th June, 1984 and he assures this Court that his clients
will fully co-operate so that the case can be heard and finally disposed of in
the High Court by the end of June, 1984. We request the High Court to dispose
of the matter finally as expeditiously as possible. In view of this, the
learned Attorney General does not press the Transfer Petition for the present
which is accordingly dismissed.
N.V.K. Writ Petition allowed Transfer