Follow @SCJudgments
Login :
Advocate
|
Client
Supreme Court Judgments
Subscribe
JAN TO JUNE
JULY TO DEC
Sub Menu contents
OCTOBER 1964
1.
Commissioner Income-Tax, Madras Vs. Andhra Chamber Commerce [1964] INSC 210 (1 October 1964)
2.
Indore Malwa United Mills Ltd., Indore Vs. State Madhya Bharat & Ors [1964] INSC 211 (1 October 1964)
3.
Municipal Corporation For Greater Bombay Vs. Lala PanchamBombay & Ors [1964] INSC 212 (1 October 1964)
4.
N. B. Jeejeebhoy Vs. Assistant Collector, Thana Prant, Thana [1964] INSC 213 (5 October 1964)
5.
P. Vajravelu Mudaliar Vs. Special Deputy Collector, Madras & ANR [1964] INSC 214 (5 October 1964)
6.
StateKerala Vs. K. M. Charia Abdullah & Co. [1964] INSC 215 (5 October 1964)
7.
M/S. Modi Spinning & Weaving Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner Income-Tax, Punjab & ANR [1964] INSC 216 (5 October 1964)
8.
Commissioner, Quilon Municipality, Quilon, and another Vs. M/S. Harrisons & Crossfield Ltd. [1964] INSC 217 (5 October 1964)
9.
Sardar Govindrao & Ors Vs. StateMadhya Pradesh [1964] INSC 218 (6 October 1964)
10.
Kashiram Agarwala Vs. UnionIndia & Ors [1964] INSC 219 (6 October 1964)
11.
Commissioner Income-Tax, Punjab Vs. R. D. Aggarwal & Company [1964] INSC 220 (6 October 1964)
12.
Administrator-General of West Bengal Vs. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Calcutta [1964] INSC 221 (6 October 1964)
13.
Bishun Narain Mishra Vs. StateUttar Pradesh & Ors [1964] INSC 222 (7 October 1964)
14.
Devilal Modi, Proprietor, M/S. Daluram Pannalal Modi Vs. Sales Tax Officer, Ratlam & Ors [1964] INSC 223 (7 October 1964)
15.
Commissioner Income-Tax, Madras Vs. Ajax Products Ltd. Through Its Liquidator [1964] INSC 224 (8 October 1964)
16.
Smt. Laxmi Devi Vs. Sethani Mukand Kanwar & Two Others [1964] INSC 225 (9 October 1964)
17.
Ramanbhai Ashabhai Patel Vs. Dabhi Ajithkumar Fulsinji & Ors [1964] INSC 226 (9 October 1964)
18.
Commissioner Income-Tax, Gujarat Vs. Ashokbhai Chimanbhai [1964] INSC 227 (20 October 1964)
19.
Kaviraj Pandit Durga Dutt Sharma Vs. Navaratna Pharmaceutical Laboratories [1964] INSC 228 (20 October 1964)
20.
M/S. Jaipuria Brothers Co. Vs. State Uttar Pradesh & Ors [1964] INSC 229 (21 October 1964)
21.
Bombay Steam Navigation Co. (1953) Private Ltd. Vs. Commissioner Income-Tax, Bombay [1964] INSC 230 (21 October 1964)
22.
Associated Banking Corporation India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner Income-Tax, Bombay [1964] INSC 231 (22 October 1964)
23.
M/S. Ouchterloney Valley Estates Ltd. Vs. State Kerala [1964] INSC 232 (23 October 1964)
24.
Punjab Rao Vs. D. P. Meshram & Ors [1964] INSC 233 (26 October 1964)
25.
Shri Roshanlal Gautam Vs. State Uttar Pradesh & Ors [1964] INSC 234 (26 October 1964)
26.
Commissioner Income-Tax, Madras Vs. Indian Bank Lid [1964] INSC 235 (26 October 1964)
27.
Pr. Al. M. M. Annamalai Chettiar Vs. Commissioner Income-Tax, Madras [1964] INSC 236 (26 October 1964)
28.
Commissioner Income-Tax, Madras Vs. V. Mr. P. Firm, Muar [1964] INSC 237 (26 October 1964)
29.
State Assam & ANR Vs. Ajit Kumar Sharma & Ors [1964] INSC 238 (27 October 1964)
30.
Commissioner Income-Tax, Madras Vs. S. Raman Chettiar [1964] INSC 239 (27 October 1964)
31.
Smt. Surasaibalini Debi Vs. Phanindra Mohan Majumdar [1964] INSC 240 (27 October 1964)
32.
Navnitlal C. Javeri Vs. K. K. Sen, Assistant Commissioner Of income-Tax [1964] INSC 241 (28 October 1964)
33.
M/S. J. K. Cotton Spinning & Weaving Nulls Co. Ltd. Vs. Sales Tax Officer, Kanpur & ANR [1964] INSC 242 (28 October 1964)
34.
Management Delhi Transport Undertaking Vs. Industrial Tribunal, Delhi & ANR [1964] INSC 243 (30 October 1964)
35.
Commissioner Income-Tax, New Delhi Vs. Rao Thakur Narayan Singh [1964] INSC 244 (30 October 1964)
36.
Raza Buland Sugar Co. Ltd. Vs. Municlpal Board, Rampur [1964] INSC 245 (30 October 1964)
37.
Sajjan Singh Vs. StateRajasthan [1964] INSC 246 (30 October 1964)
Tweet
Client Area
|
Advocate Area
|
Blogs
|
About Us
|
User Agreement
|
Privacy Policy
|
Advertise
|
Media Coverage
|
Contact Us
|
Site Map
Powered by Neosys Inc
Information provided on advocatekhoj.com is solely available at your request for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement