Login : Advocate | Client
Home Post Your Case My Account Law College Law Library

Supreme Court Judgments

Latest Supreme Court of India Judgments 2024


RSS Feed img

State of Haryana and Ors. Etc. Vs. Bant Lal Etc.

[Civil Appeal No. 2634-2671 of 2018]

[Civil Appeal No. 2672-2688 of 2018]


1. The parties are before this Court disputing the land value fixed in respect of the acquired land. The State is aggrieved by the value fixed; whereas the claimants want higher compensation.

2. When the matter came up to this Court, on 02.08.2018, after extensive hearing, the following order was passed :-

"We have heard learned counsel on both sides and also gone through the records. We have given two options to the claimants. First option is, as far as land acquired for water works is concerned, we will fix the value of the land at Rs.30,00,000/- (Rupees Thirty Lakhs) per acre, having regard to the fact that in certain sale deeds of other persons for the similar land the same value is fixed and as far as the land acquired in Sewage Treatment Plant (STP) is concerned, the value will be slightly enhanced and may be fixed at Rs.40,00,000/- (Rupees Forty Lakhs) per acre. Second option is that the Government will return the unutilised land to the claimants, and remand the matters to the High Court for appropriate fixation of land value in respect of the actual land utilised by the Government, with liberty to both the sides to lead additional evidence. Post the matter on Tuesday, the 7th August, 2018 in "Miscellaneous Hearing" at the top of the Board as part-heard."

3. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, it is submitted that the second option will be the best option in the fitness of things. In the above circumstances, the appeals are disposed of as follows :-

i) The Government will return the un-utilised land to the claimants in accordance with law.

ii) As far as the remaining land is concerned, we set aside the fixation made by the High Court and remit the matters to the High Court with liberty to both sides to lead additional evidence.

4. We make it clear that the first option is no reflexion on any idea of just compensation made by this Court.

5. In view of the fact that we have set aside the impugned Judgment of the High Court, it will be open to the State to approach the Reference Court for refund of the amounts already deposited in terms of the orders passed by this Court.

.......................J. [KURIAN JOSEPH]

.......................J. [SANJAY KISHAN KAUL]

New Delhi;

August 10, 2018.

Latest Supreme Court Judgments Back

Client Area | Advocate Area | Blogs | About Us | User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Advertise | Media Coverage | Contact Us | Site Map
Powered and driven by Neosys Inc