AdvocateKhoj
Login : Advocate | Client
Home Post Your Case My Account Law College Law Library
    

22H. Powers of Settlement Commission to grant immunity from prosecution.

(1) The Settlement Commission may, if it is satisfied that any person who made the application for settlement under section 22C has co-operated with the Settlement Commission in the proceedings before it and has made a full and true disclosure of his net wealth and the manner in which such wealth has been acquired, grant to such person, subject to such conditions as it may think fit to impose, immunity from prosecution for any offence under this Act or under the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) or under any other Central Act for the time being in force 1[and also (either wholly or in part) from the imposition of any penalty] under this Act, with respect to the case covered by the settlement:

2[Provided that no such immunity shall be granted by the Settlement Commission in cases where the proceedings for the prosecution for any such offence have been instituted before the date of receipt of the application under section 22C:]

3[Provided further that the Settlement Commission shall not grant immunity from prosecution for any offence under the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) or under any Central Act other than this Act andIncome-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961) to a person who makes an application under section 22C on or after the 1st day of June, 2007.]

2[(1A) An immunity granted to a person under sub-section (1) shall stand withdrawn if such person fails to pay any sum specified in the order of settlement passed under sub-section (4) of section 22D within the time specified in such order or within such further time as may be allowed by the Settlement Commission, or fails to comply with any other condition subject to which the immunity was granted and thereupon the provisions of this Act shall apply as if such immunity had not been granted.]

(2) An immunity granted to a person under sub-section (1) may, at any time, be withdrawn by the Settlement Commission, if it is satisfied that such person 4 *** had, in the course of the settlement proceedings, concealed any particular material to the settlement or had given false evidence, and thereupon such person may be tried for the offence with respect to which the immunity was granted or for any other offence of which he appears to have been guilty in connection with the settlement and shall also become liable to the imposition of any penalty under this Act to which such person would have been liable, had no such immunity been granted.

1. Subs. by Act 67 of 1984, s. 63, for "and also from the imposition of any penalty" (w.e.f. 1-10-1984).

2. Ins. by Act 11 of 1987, s. 84 (w.e.f. 1-6-1987).

3. Ins. by Act 22 of 2007, s. 90 (w.e.f. 1-6-2007).

4. The words "has not complied with the conditions subject to which the immunity was granted or that such person" omitted by Act 11 of 1987, s. 84 (w.e.f. 1-6-1987).



Delhi Development Act, 1957 Back




Client Area | Advocate Area | Blogs | About Us | User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Advertise | Media Coverage | Contact Us | Site Map
powered and driven by neosys