Login : Advocate | Client
Home Post Your Case My Account Law College Law Library

The Terrorist and Disruptive and Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987

19. Appeal. -

  1. Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code, an appeal shall lie as a matter of right from any judgment, sentence or order, not being an interlocutory order, of a Designated Court to the Supreme Court both on facts and on law.
  2. Except as aforesaid, no appeal or revision shall lie to any court from any judgment, sentence or order including an interlocutory order of a Designated Court.
  3. Every appeal under this section shall be preferred within a period of thirty days from the date of the judgment; sentence or order appealed from:

that the Supreme Court may entertain an appeal after the expiry of the said period of thirty days if it is satisfied that the appellant had sufficient cause for not preferring the appeal within the period of thirty days.


Act does not curtail any power and fucion of High Court under writ jurisdiction. Abdul Hamid Haji Mohammed v. State of Maharashtra. 1994 Cri.L.J. 1447 = 1994(4) Bom CR 51 (Bom)

Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 Back

Client Area | Advocate Area | Blogs | About Us | User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Advertise | Media Coverage | Contact Us | Site Map
powered and driven by neosys