Union of India Vs. Sampat
[Civil Appeal No. 5085 of 2012 (@ Special Leave Petition (C) No.21341 of 2004]
O R D E R
1. Leave granted.
2. Delay condoned.
3. We have heard learned counsel for the parties to the lis.
4. Both sides would agree that the issues raised and the relief sought for in this appeal are identical with the issues raised and considered by this Court in the case of Union of India Vs. Giani in Civil Appeal No.1884/2011 on February 17, 2011.
5. In view of the above, this appeal is also disposed of, in the same terms, observations and directions contained in the aforesaid order.
.......................J. (H.L. DATTU)
.......................J. (CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD)
JULY 09, 2012
ITEM NO.48 COURT NO.8 SECTION XIV
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).21341/2004
(From the judgment and order dated 31/05/2002 in RFA No.466/1986 of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)
Union of India Vs Sampat (With prayer for interim relief and office report )
This Petition was called on for hearing today.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD
Mr. J. S. Attri, Sr. Adv.
Mrs. Rekha Pandey, Adv.
for Mrs Anil Katiyar, Adv.
Mr. K. L. Janjani, Adv.
Mr.Pankaj Kumar Singh, Adv.
For Mr. Raj Singh Rana,Adv.
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
We have heard learned counsel for the parties to the lis.
Appeal disposed of, in terms of the signed order.
(signed order is placed on the file)